present,past,futuresimple,andfutureinthepasttense

The correct answer is (B) received.

In the sentence, the action of receiving positive reviews is completed or happened in the past based on the word “recently”. According to the tense rule, to express completed actions, we use the past simple tense. Hence, "received" is the correct choice here.

(A) "receives" is in the present tense and is used for habits or general truths. The sentence is talking about a specific action that happened in the past, not a general truth or habit.

(C) "was receiving" is in the past continuous tense and is used for actions that were in progress at a specific time in the past or for actions that were happening over a period of time in the past. The sentence is talking about a completed action, not an action in progress.

(D) "is received" is in the present passive voice. We usually use the passive voice when the focus is on the action, not who is doing the action. In this sentence, the focus is on the person (Liza Baley) who is doing the action, so we need to use the active voice. Also, "is received" is in the present tense, and the sentence is talking about a past event, so we need to use the past tense. 

The correct answer is (B) will resume.

In this sentence, we are using the future simple tense, which is formed with "will" + the base form of the verb. We use the future simple tense when we predict that something will happen in the future. Here, the verb is "resume", and it is used to express the prediction that construction on a new wing at the Hamilton Museum will start again once additional funding has been arranged.

(A) "has been resumed" is incorrect because it uses the present perfect tense, which is used for actions that started in the past and continue in the present or have an effect on the present. This doesn't fit the context of the sentence because the funding has not yet been arranged.

(C) "was resumed" is incorrect because it uses the past simple tense. This tense is used for actions that have already finished. This doesn't make sense in the context of the sentence because the action hasn't happened yet.

(D) "to be resuming" is incorrect because it's not a proper verb tense. It looks like an infinitive (to be) followed by a present participle (resuming), but this form doesn't fit the future prediction expressed in the sentence. 

The correct answer is (C) rains.

Type 1 conditional sentences are used to talk about possible situations, events, or outcomes that are likely to happen in the future. In this type of conditional sentence, the condition clause (if-clause) is in the simple present tense, while the main clause uses the simple future tense. Thus, "If it rains tomorrow, the company outing will be put off until next week" is a correct type 1 conditional sentence.

(A) "will rain" is incorrect because it uses the simple future tense. In a type 1 conditional sentence, the if-clause should be in the simple present tense.

(B) "would rain" is also incorrect. "Would" is a modal verb used in the second and third conditional to talk about unreal or unlikely situations. It is not used in the simple present tense if-clause of a type 1 conditional sentence.

(D) "rained" is incorrect because it is in the simple past tense. In type 1 conditional sentences, the if-clause uses the simple present tense, not the past tense. 

The correct answer is (D) had to.

We can tell this stance is a past event based on “when a few of his filming crew did not arrive on schedule.” “did not arrive” indicates that this is a past event. Therefore, we must use the past tense form of the verb "to have" which is "had".

(A) "has to" is incorrect because it is in the present tense. This implies that Anthony Mandler needs to postpone the filming now, which contradicts the timeline given in the sentence.

(B) "will have to" is also incorrect because it is in the future tense. This suggests that Anthony Mandler will need to postpone the filming in the future, which also contradicts the timeline given in the sentence.

(C) "having to" is incorrect because it is in the present participle form. This form is used to express ongoing actions, which does not fit with the completed action of postponing the filming. Furthermore, it does not agree with the subject "Anthony Mandler" who is a single individual and thus requires a singular verb form.

The correct answer is (A) will expire.

"Will expire" is the correct answer because the sentence is referring to a future event, the end of the membership in January. In English, we use "will" to talk about future events, hence "will expire" is the correct choice.

(B) "expired" is incorrect because this form is in the past tense, suggesting the event has already occurred. According to the sentence, though, the membership has not yet expired; it will expire at the end of January.

(C) "to expire" is incorrect because it does not align with the future tense context of the sentence. This form is typically used after certain verbs and adjectives, not in this context.

(D) "expiring" is incorrect because it indicates an ongoing process. If we were currently in the month of January, "expiring" could potentially work; however, the sentence suggests we are not yet in January. Therefore, "will expire" is the correct choice. 

The correct answer is (A) affirmed.

In this sentence, the use of the past tense 'affirmed' is appropriate because the action has already taken place. The accountant has already determined the invalidity of the travel expenses and this decision was made in the past, therefore the past tense is required to correctly articulate this.

(B) 'have affirmed' is incorrect due to a subject-verb agreement error. In this case, if the subject 'accountant' was 'accountants' (plural), then 'have affirmed' would be correct. However, as 'accountant' is singular, the verb 'have affirmed' is not correct.

(C) 'affirms' is incorrect as it is in the present tense, but the context of the sentence indicates that the action (the accountant determining the travel expenses are invalid) has already occurred in the past.

(D) 'will affirm' is incorrect because it suggests that the action will occur in the future. This contradicts the sentence, which implies that the decision about the travel expenses has already been made. 

The correct answer is (D) be held.

The sentence is in passive voice and is talking about a future event. In English, passive voice in the future is constructed with "will" + "be" + past participle of the main verb. In this case, the main verb is "hold", and its past participle is "held", so the correct form is "will be held".

(A) "have held" is incorrect because it is in present perfect tense, which does not fit the future context of the sentence.
(B) "be holding" is incorrect because it is in present continuous tense, which is also not appropriate for the future context of the sentence.
(C) "hold" is incorrect because it is in base form. This doesn't match with the future tense context and the passive voice required by the sentence. 

The correct answer is (D) closed.

The sentence is in the past tense, as indicated by the use of "yesterday." Therefore, the verb that follows must also be in the past tense. "Closed" is the past tense of "close" and fits the context of the sentence, meaning that the businesses were not open.

(A) "Are closed" is incorrect because it is in the present tense, not the past. The use of "are" indicates a current state of being, which contrasts with the past tense context provided by "yesterday."

(B) "To close" is incorrect because it is an infinitive form of the verb and does not fit into the sentence structure appropriately. It would be used in a sentence like "The businesses on Ellory Avenue planned to close early yesterday..."

(C) "Closing" is incorrect because it is a gerund or present participle form of the verb. It implies an ongoing action, which is inconsistent with the past tense context of the sentence. 

The correct answer is (A) won't.

Type 1 conditional sentences are used to talk about real and possible situations. In these sentences, the condition clause is in the present simple tense, and the result clause is in the future simple tense. In this sentence, the condition is "Unless you promise to behave yourself, Johnny," which is in the present simple tense. Therefore, the result clause should be in the future simple tense: "I won't take you to the movies this weekend."

(B) “wouldn't” is incorrect because it is the past tense of will, and this sentence is not talking about the past; it's talking about a future event. 

(C) “couldn't” is incorrect because it indicates an inability to perform an action, rather than a conditional decision on whether or not to perform the action. 

(D) “don't” is incorrect because it is the present tense, not the future tense, which is needed to match the first clause of the sentence. Therefore, all the other options are incorrect based on the rules of subject-verb agreement and the type 1 conditional rule.