Last week, a popular podcast covered an intense debate about whether internet privacy should be restricted, and it featured multiple experts who represented the key groups that could be impacted. Those experts who opposed the idea of limiting internet privacy in any way were given a lot more time on the podcast compared with those who were in support of limiting people's privacy online. Thus, the podcast has a strong bias against laws restricting internet privacy.
Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
-
radio_button_unchecked(A) Most of the podcast's listeners had a good understanding of what the debate was about.
-
radio_button_unchecked(B) Many of the experts who favored the idea of limiting internet privacy refused to take part in the podcast and declined their invitation.
-
radio_button_unchecked(C) During the podcast, those who were against restricting internet privacy were more emotional than those who spoke in favor of less privacy online.
-
radio_button_unchecked(D) After the podcast, most of its listeners acknowledged the need for more internet privacy in an anonymous poll conducted online.
-
radio_button_unchecked(E) The creators of the podcast are well-known advocates for human rights for internet users.