Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.
Writing értékelés kérése
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.
| Step | What to Write | How Long |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | State your position | 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective. |
| 2 | Support your position | 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score. |
| 3 | Wrap up | 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete. |
Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.
Template:Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.
| Starting your response |
I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by… Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective. I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because… This is a thought-provoking question. In my view… |
| Introducing your main idea |
One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is… From my experience, I have found that… A key reason I hold this view is… To illustrate this point… |
| Providing examples |
For instance, in my country/school/workplace… A clear example of this is… Consider the case of… In my high school/university, for example… |
| Connecting ideas |
Furthermore, … This is significant because… As a result, … In other words, … |
| Concluding your response |
For these reasons, I believe that… Therefore, … In short, … That is why I think… |
What to notice:
In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.
You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.
Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:
| Type | What You Do | Frequency |
| Opinion | You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. | ~50% |
| Choosing an Approach | You pick between two options and explain why one is better. | ~40% |
| Proposing a Solution | You suggest a way to solve a problem. | Rare |
| Problems and Solutions | You identify a problem and propose a solution. | Rare |
| Description and Explanation | You explain why something is important or beneficial. | Rare |
The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.
Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:
Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.
Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.
It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.
| Wrong approach | Right approach |
| "I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later." This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new. |
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run." This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle. |
A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.
Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:
| Agreeing and building on it |
I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add… [Name]'s perspective resonates with me because… Building on what [name] said, I think… I would like to add to [name]'s point about… |
| Disagreeing respectfully |
While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently… I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective… I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that… I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that… |
| Adding a new perspective |
In addition to what has been discussed… Another aspect worth considering is… Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important. I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic. |
Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:
If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.
You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:
| 0:00–2:00 | Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use. |
| 2:00–8:00 | Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences). |
| 8:00–10:00 | Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words. |
Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.
Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.
Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.
Writing értékelés kérése
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.
| Step | What to Write | How Long |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | State your position | 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective. |
| 2 | Support your position | 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score. |
| 3 | Wrap up | 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete. |
Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.
Template:Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.
| Starting your response |
I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by… Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective. I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because… This is a thought-provoking question. In my view… |
| Introducing your main idea |
One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is… From my experience, I have found that… A key reason I hold this view is… To illustrate this point… |
| Providing examples |
For instance, in my country/school/workplace… A clear example of this is… Consider the case of… In my high school/university, for example… |
| Connecting ideas |
Furthermore, … This is significant because… As a result, … In other words, … |
| Concluding your response |
For these reasons, I believe that… Therefore, … In short, … That is why I think… |
What to notice:
In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.
You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.
Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:
| Type | What You Do | Frequency |
| Opinion | You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. | ~50% |
| Choosing an Approach | You pick between two options and explain why one is better. | ~40% |
| Proposing a Solution | You suggest a way to solve a problem. | Rare |
| Problems and Solutions | You identify a problem and propose a solution. | Rare |
| Description and Explanation | You explain why something is important or beneficial. | Rare |
The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.
Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:
Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.
Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.
It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.
| Wrong approach | Right approach |
| "I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later." This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new. |
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run." This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle. |
A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.
Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:
| Agreeing and building on it |
I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add… [Name]'s perspective resonates with me because… Building on what [name] said, I think… I would like to add to [name]'s point about… |
| Disagreeing respectfully |
While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently… I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective… I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that… I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that… |
| Adding a new perspective |
In addition to what has been discussed… Another aspect worth considering is… Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important. I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic. |
Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:
If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.
You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:
| 0:00–2:00 | Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use. |
| 2:00–8:00 | Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences). |
| 8:00–10:00 | Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words. |
Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.
Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.
Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.
Writing értékelés kérése
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.
| Step | What to Write | How Long |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | State your position | 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective. |
| 2 | Support your position | 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score. |
| 3 | Wrap up | 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete. |
Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.
Template:Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.
| Starting your response |
I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by… Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective. I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because… This is a thought-provoking question. In my view… |
| Introducing your main idea |
One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is… From my experience, I have found that… A key reason I hold this view is… To illustrate this point… |
| Providing examples |
For instance, in my country/school/workplace… A clear example of this is… Consider the case of… In my high school/university, for example… |
| Connecting ideas |
Furthermore, … This is significant because… As a result, … In other words, … |
| Concluding your response |
For these reasons, I believe that… Therefore, … In short, … That is why I think… |
What to notice:
In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.
You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.
Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:
| Type | What You Do | Frequency |
| Opinion | You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. | ~50% |
| Choosing an Approach | You pick between two options and explain why one is better. | ~40% |
| Proposing a Solution | You suggest a way to solve a problem. | Rare |
| Problems and Solutions | You identify a problem and propose a solution. | Rare |
| Description and Explanation | You explain why something is important or beneficial. | Rare |
The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.
Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:
Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.
Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.
It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.
| Wrong approach | Right approach |
| "I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later." This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new. |
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run." This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle. |
A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.
Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:
| Agreeing and building on it |
I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add… [Name]'s perspective resonates with me because… Building on what [name] said, I think… I would like to add to [name]'s point about… |
| Disagreeing respectfully |
While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently… I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective… I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that… I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that… |
| Adding a new perspective |
In addition to what has been discussed… Another aspect worth considering is… Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important. I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic. |
Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:
If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.
You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:
| 0:00–2:00 | Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use. |
| 2:00–8:00 | Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences). |
| 8:00–10:00 | Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words. |
Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.
Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.
Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.
Writing értékelés kérése
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
GyengeségekMagyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.
Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez
...
Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.
| Step | What to Write | How Long |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | State your position | 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective. |
| 2 | Support your position | 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score. |
| 3 | Wrap up | 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete. |
Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.
Template:Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.
| Starting your response |
I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by… Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective. I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because… This is a thought-provoking question. In my view… |
| Introducing your main idea |
One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is… From my experience, I have found that… A key reason I hold this view is… To illustrate this point… |
| Providing examples |
For instance, in my country/school/workplace… A clear example of this is… Consider the case of… In my high school/university, for example… |
| Connecting ideas |
Furthermore, … This is significant because… As a result, … In other words, … |
| Concluding your response |
For these reasons, I believe that… Therefore, … In short, … That is why I think… |
What to notice:
In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.
You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.
Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:
| Type | What You Do | Frequency |
| Opinion | You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. | ~50% |
| Choosing an Approach | You pick between two options and explain why one is better. | ~40% |
| Proposing a Solution | You suggest a way to solve a problem. | Rare |
| Problems and Solutions | You identify a problem and propose a solution. | Rare |
| Description and Explanation | You explain why something is important or beneficial. | Rare |
The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.
Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:
Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.
Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.
It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.
| Wrong approach | Right approach |
| "I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later." This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new. |
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run." This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle. |
A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.
Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:
| Agreeing and building on it |
I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add… [Name]'s perspective resonates with me because… Building on what [name] said, I think… I would like to add to [name]'s point about… |
| Disagreeing respectfully |
While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently… I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective… I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that… I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that… |
| Adding a new perspective |
In addition to what has been discussed… Another aspect worth considering is… Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important. I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic. |
Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:
If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.
You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:
| 0:00–2:00 | Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use. |
| 2:00–8:00 | Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences). |
| 8:00–10:00 | Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words. |
Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.
Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.