BestMyLingo GMAT TOEIC IELTS TOEFL

general

Find out how toefl Tutor can help you achieve your target score

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Botany. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, plants sustain human life by providing food, shelter, clothing, and medicine. Different communities rely on particular plants for nourishment, livelihoods, and cultural identity. Choosing one reveals what a society values and needs most. If you had to select a single plant, which would you argue is most important—to you or to people in your country? Why?


We all live in societies shaped by the plants we depend on. For my country, rice is the plant that matters most. It feeds families, anchors traditions, and stabilizes our economy. Without it, daily life would be less secure and less connected. Clearly, rice deserves the highest priority. I think the REAL question is, which approach to strengthening rice’s role should be the priority.


I disagree with Kelly that rice is the most important plant. Wheat is actually more crucial for our needs. It supports balanced diets, adapts to varied conditions, and sustains livelihoods across regions. With better planning and investment, it can strengthen food security and stability. Its role in trade and culture is also significant. Therefore, I think our country should prioritize wheat.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, plants sustain human life by providing food, shelter, clothing, and medicine. Different communities rely on particular plants for nourishment, livelihoods, and cultural identity. Choosing one reveals what a society values and needs most. If you had to select a single plant, which would you argue is most important—to you or to people in your country? Why?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Animals. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, animals shape our ecosystems, economies, and cultures. Some are vital for food production, others for environmental balance or national identity. When we discuss importance, we weigh ecological impact, economic value, and cultural meaning. If you had to choose, which animal is the most important in your country, and why? Support your choice with clear reasons and specific details.


We all share responsibility for the species that sustain our lives and landscapes. In my view, the most important animal in my country is the one that anchors both our ecosystems and our livelihoods, shaping identity and stability. Without it, daily life would become harder and less secure. I think the REAL question is, which strategy—stronger protections, better management, public education, or something else—should take priority.


I disagree with Kelly that choosing a single iconic creature makes it the most important animal in our country. Importance should be measured by how many relationships an animal supports across nature, work, and community well-being. A network that maintains productivity and balance matters more than one emblem. Therefore, I think we should focus our attention and resources on the animals that keep essential systems functioning.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, animals shape our ecosystems, economies, and cultures. Some are vital for food production, others for environmental balance or national identity. When we discuss importance, we weigh ecological impact, economic value, and cultural meaning. If you had to choose, which animal is the most important in your country, and why? Support your choice with clear reasons and specific details.

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Rural development. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, receiving a piece of land forces you to set priorities about purpose, impact, and responsibility. Land can be used to generate economic value, support community needs, or protect natural systems, but every choice involves trade-offs and long-term commitments. If you were given land to use as you wish, how would you use it, and why?


We all share responsibility for the spaces we control, and land is a chance to heal and uplift. I would dedicate the land to conservation and community well-being. Protecting habitats, improving soil and water, and creating a safe, welcoming place for people supports health, learning, and resilience. The real decision is how to balance restoration, public access, and long-term stewardship.


I disagree with Morgan that conservation and public access should come first. The most responsible use is productive development that creates value. Thoughtful construction on the land can expand opportunities, stabilize families, and strengthen local revenues. With clear rules, strong design, and accountability, development can be efficient, safe, and adaptable. Therefore, I would prioritize building capacity to meet economic and social needs.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, receiving a piece of land forces you to set priorities about purpose, impact, and responsibility. Land can be used to generate economic value, support community needs, or protect natural systems, but every choice involves trade-offs and long-term commitments. If you were given land to use as you wish, how would you use it, and why?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Daily life. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, many everyday products can be created by skilled craftspeople or mass-produced with machines. Choosing between them reflects values about quality, cost, and individuality. For instance, shoppers often balance uniqueness against affordability and consistency. If you had to choose, which would you prefer—items made by hand or items made by machine? Why?


I value the human touch in the things I use every day. Handmade items often carry intention, care, and a sense of connection to the maker. Clearly, I prefer items made by hand over machine-made goods. I think the REAL question is, which aspect of handmade work—craftsmanship, durability, ethical production, or sustainability—should matter most when we decide what to buy.


I disagree with Jordan that handmade items are better than machine-made ones. Consistency, safety standards, and affordability matter to most households, and machines excel at delivering those benefits. Also, efficient production reduces waste and increases access. Therefore, I prefer items made by machine because they provide reliable quality at reasonable prices and free people’s time for creativity in design rather than repetitive labor.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, many everyday products can be created by skilled craftspeople or mass-produced with machines. Choosing between them reflects values about quality, cost, and individuality. For instance, shoppers often balance uniqueness against affordability and consistency. If you had to choose, which would you prefer—items made by hand or items made by machine? Why?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Psychology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, people often form first impressions about others very quickly, while others prefer to reserve judgment until they have more information. These two attitudes can lead to different interactions and decisions. If you had to choose, which approach do you believe is better—trusting first impressions or withholding judgment until later? Why?


We all meet new people in many settings, and first impressions can be misleading. Therefore, we should avoid deciding a person’s character too quickly. Clearly, reserving judgment leads to fairer, more accurate conclusions. I think the REAL question is, which approach to careful evaluation—observing consistent behavior over time, listening closely, seeking multiple perspectives, or asking thoughtful questions—should be our priority when forming opinions about someone.


I disagree with Kelly that we should hold off on judging character. First impressions are often based on meaningful patterns our minds recognize quickly. They help us act efficiently and navigate everyday situations with confidence. Also, trusting your initial read does not prevent you from revising it as you learn more. Therefore, I think first impressions are generally dependable and worth following.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, people often form first impressions about others very quickly, while others prefer to reserve judgment until they have more information. These two attitudes can lead to different interactions and decisions. If you had to choose, which approach do you believe is better—trusting first impressions or withholding judgment until later? Why?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Psychology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, decisions can be made in a flash or after careful reflection. Part of developing good judgment is knowing when speed helps and when patience leads to better results. Some people claim that quick choices are always mistakes, while others disagree. Do you agree or disagree with the statement: “The decisions that people make quickly are always wrong”? Why?


We make countless choices every day, and not all of them deserve the same amount of time. Saying that quick decisions are always wrong is an overstatement. With experience, training, and clear values, swift judgments can be sound. I think the real question is, which decisions benefit from speed and intuition, and which require careful analysis, consultation, and time?


I disagree with Jordan that quick decisions are always wrong. Good decision-making depends on preparation, priorities, and context. When people understand their goals and constraints, they can judge efficiently without sacrificing accuracy. Reflection is valuable, but delay can create confusion and missed opportunities. Therefore, I think people should decide quickly when conditions are clear, and slow down when uncertainty is high.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, decisions can be made in a flash or after careful reflection. Part of developing good judgment is knowing when speed helps and when patience leads to better results. Some people claim that quick choices are always mistakes, while others disagree. Do you agree or disagree with the statement: “The decisions that people make quickly are always wrong”? Why?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Clothing. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, the clothes we wear can affect how we feel and how others respond to us. Part of understanding this topic involves thinking about identity, social expectations, and professionalism. For example, many people choose different outfits for work than for leisure to match the situation. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Why?


We all present ourselves to the world every day, and clothing is a big part of that presentation. Therefore, what we wear naturally shapes our feelings, confidence, and decisions in different situations. Clearly, different clothes do influence behavior, because attire frames our roles and signals how we should act. I think the REAL question is, which aspect—uniforms, formal dress codes, casual wear, or expressive fashion—most strongly shapes behavior.


I disagree with Jordan that clothing significantly changes how people behave. Character, values, and habits guide actions much more than fabrics or styles. When people know their goals and responsibilities, they act consistently regardless of what they are wearing. Therefore, we should focus on building self-discipline and ethical standards, not on outfits, if we want to improve behavior.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, the clothes we wear can affect how we feel and how others respond to us. Part of understanding this topic involves thinking about identity, social expectations, and professionalism. For example, many people choose different outfits for work than for leisure to match the situation. Do you agree that different clothes influence the way people behave? Why?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Media. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

We have already discussed in class, as we continue to navigate the rapidly changing world of technology, it is crucial for us to critically analyze the strengths and limitations of various modes of communication. Today, we embark on a thoughtful exploration of interpersonal connections in this digital age: is face-to-face communication better than other forms like letters, email, or telephone calls? What are your thoughts on this? Let’s discuss the merits and faults of different communication methods and how they impact our connections with others.


I wholeheartedly agree that face-to-face communication holds distinct advantages over other forms of communication like letters, email, or telephone calls. While technological advancements have made long-distance communication more accessible and convenient, NOTHING can fully replicate the richness and depth of face-to-face interactions. Nonverbal cues, such as facial expressions and body language, play a crucial role in conveying emotions and fostering GENUINE connections.


Respectfully, I must express a different viewpoint. While face-to-face communication certainly has its merits, I believe that other forms of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls, offer unique advantages of their own. For instance, these alternative modes of communication provide flexibility, convenience, and the ability to connect across vast distances. I think they allow for thoughtful reflection and provide a written record of conversations, ensuring clarity and accuracy in communication.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
We have already discussed in class, as we continue to navigate the rapidly changing world of technology, it is crucial for us to critically analyze the strengths and limitations of various modes of communication. Today, we embark on a thoughtful exploration of interpersonal connections in this digital age: is face-to-face communication better than other forms like letters, email, or telephone calls? What are your thoughts on this? Let’s discuss the merits and faults of different communication methods and how they impact our connections with others.

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Hozz létre fiókot a haladás mentéséhez

Your professor is teaching a class on Art history. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

Today, we are here to explore the fascinating world of art, culture, and history. But have you ever wondered why people visit museums? Museums are not just about showcasing exhibits, they are windows into the past, present, and future. People visit museums to learn, connect, and be inspired. So, let's embark on a journey of discovery as we unravel the mysteries and wonders of our museum's treasures. Here is a question for the discussion board: Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums?


One of the reasons I love visiting museums is that they inspire me. Seeing breathtaking works of art, scientific discoveries, or historical artifacts can ignite our creativity and spark new ideas. It's incredible how a single visit to a museum can leave you feeling inspired and motivated to explore more.


Well, I realized that museums are like time capsules that hold pieces of our history, art, and culture. They offer a unique opportunity to learn and expand our knowledge beyond what we read in textbooks or see online. Museums are also a way to connect with our roots and understand where we come from.

Word Count: 0

Regisztrálj ingyenesen további tartalomért

Kulcsszavak ebben a gyakorlófeladatban
Ehhez a gyakorlófeladathoz nincs kapcsolódó szókincs

Esszéje értékelése nyelvtani javításokkal és részletes pontozási jelentéssel.

Writing értékelés kérése

Sample Writing Review

Pontszám-összegzés
4.5 / 6
AI-értékelés
Feladat teljesítése
Általános szerkezet
Relevancia
Nyelvtan
Szókincs
Koherencia
Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
Javitasi jelmagyarazat

Piros javitasok
Kek akademiai nyelvi javaslatok

Reszletes visszajelzes

Nyelvtani javitasok es visszajelzes
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Feladat teljesítése


Általános szerkezet


Relevancia


Nyelvtan


Szókincs


Koherencia


cancel Nyelvtan

reader.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
readers. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

when
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

a
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

for
Magyarázat Magyarázat
to Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

make
Magyarázat Magyarázat
makes Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

confidence
Magyarázat Magyarázat
confident Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

by
Magyarázat Magyarázat
through Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

upload
Magyarázat Magyarázat
uploaded Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

click
Magyarázat Magyarázat
clicked the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

show
Magyarázat Magyarázat
showed an Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

become
Magyarázat Magyarázat
became Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
if Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Nyelvtan

was
Magyarázat Magyarázat
were Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Hello —
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Hello — Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

fine.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
well. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Philip
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Philip, Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

one
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a reader Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

readers.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
poetry magazine. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like your poetry magazine very much because
Magyarázat Magyarázat
enjoy it: Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

very
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Magyarázat Magyarázat
emotional, and reading them leaves me Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

like
Magyarázat Magyarázat
appreciate Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers
Magyarázat Magyarázat
new writers Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

new writers to
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

works. It
Magyarázat Magyarázat
work; that encouragement Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

to send
Magyarázat Magyarázat
about submitting Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

week,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
week Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

of my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

through
Magyarázat Magyarázat
using Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

my
Magyarázat Magyarázat
the Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

the submit button,
Magyarázat Magyarázat
“Submit,” Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

suddenly
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

became
Magyarázat Magyarázat
went Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

any
Magyarázat Magyarázat
a Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

not sure if
Magyarázat Magyarázat
unsure whether Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

received or not.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
received. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

tell me about
Magyarázat Magyarázat
check Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

I worry that maybe
Magyarázat Magyarázat
I’m worried Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

did
Magyarázat Magyarázat
may Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

go
Magyarázat Magyarázat
have gone Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.

cancel Magyarázat

Thank you.
Magyarázat Magyarázat
Thank you. Magyarázat: Nyelvtan.
Pontszámjelentések kritériumok szerint

Feladat teljesítése   5/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Általános szerkezet   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Relevancia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Nyelvtan   2/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Szókincs   3/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Koherencia   4/5

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat: Feladat teljesítése. Általános szerkezet. Relevancia. Nyelvtan. Szókincs. Koherencia.

Magyarázat

Kérj értékelést ennek a tartalomnak a megtekintéséhez

...

Question:
Today, we are here to explore the fascinating world of art, culture, and history. But have you ever wondered why people visit museums? Museums are not just about showcasing exhibits, they are windows into the past, present, and future. People visit museums to learn, connect, and be inspired. So, let's embark on a journey of discovery as we unravel the mysteries and wonders of our museum's treasures. Here is a question for the discussion board: Many people visit museums when they travel to new places. Why do you think people visit museums?

Nyelvtani javítás kérése


Minta nyelvtani javítások
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Megoldás Magyarázat
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Megoldás Magyarázat
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Megoldás Magyarázat
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Megoldás Magyarázat
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Megoldás Magyarázat
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Megoldás Magyarázat
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Megoldás Magyarázat
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Megoldás Magyarázat
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Megoldás Magyarázat
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Megoldás Magyarázat
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Megoldás Magyarázat
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Megoldás Magyarázat
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Megoldás Magyarázat
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Megoldás Magyarázat
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Megoldás Magyarázat
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Megoldás Magyarázat
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Megoldás Magyarázat
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Megoldás Magyarázat
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Megoldás Magyarázat
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Megoldás Magyarázat
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Megoldás Magyarázat
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Megoldás Magyarázat
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Megoldás Magyarázat
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Megoldás Magyarázat
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

Subscribe to General