BestMyLingo GMAT TOEIC IELTS TOEFL

general

Find out how toefl Tutor can help you achieve your target score

eradicate

Submitted by admin on
1. Eradicable
 
   NCC being a preventable and potentially eradicable disease, urgent interventions at community level are required to reduce the disease burden.
 
2. Eradicate
 
   Government attempts to  eradicate corruption and inflation.
 
 
schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Skapa ett konto för att spara dina framsteg

Your professor is teaching a class on Sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

In today's class, we'll explore the way people socialize and communicate in the digital age. The rise of social media and technology has led to more people choosing to socialize online rather than face-to-face. This has led to positive and negative impacts on our lives. So before the next class, I would like each of you to make a post on the following question: Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?


Hey, I believe that the shift towards online socialization has its pros and cons. On the one hand, it allows us to connect with people from all around the world, creating a global community where we can share ideas and experiences. It also provides a platform for introverted individuals who may feel more comfortable expressing themselves online. However, it's important not to neglect face-to-face interactions, as they help develop essential communication skills and foster stronger emotional connections.


Hey, I think this development can be seen as both positive and negative. It's true that socializing online has made it easier to connect with others and maintain long-distance relationships. However, I also believe that relying too much on online interactions can negatively impact our mental health and lead to feelings of isolation. It's crucial to strike a balance between online and face-to-face communication to ensure we maintain healthy relationships and develop vital social skills.

Word Count: 0

Registrera dig gratis för mer innehåll

Nyckelord i övningen
Ingen vokabulär är kopplad till denna övning

Få ditt essay betygsatt med grammatikkorrigeringar och en detaljerad poängrapport.

Få en writing-bedömning

Sample Writing Review

Poängsammanfattning
4.5 / 6
AI-bedömning
Uppgiftsuppfyllelse
Övergripande struktur
Relevans
Grammatik
Ordförråd
Sammanhang
Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
Forklaring till korrigeringarna

Korrigeringar i rott
Forslag pa akademiskt sprak i blatt

Detaljerad feedback

Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Uppgiftsuppfyllelse


Övergripande struktur


Relevans


Grammatik


Ordförråd


Sammanhang


cancel Grammatik

reader.
Förklaring Förklaring
readers. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

when
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

a
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

for
Förklaring Förklaring
to Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

make
Förklaring Förklaring
makes Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

confidence
Förklaring Förklaring
confident Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

by
Förklaring Förklaring
through Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

upload
Förklaring Förklaring
uploaded Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

click
Förklaring Förklaring
clicked the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

show
Förklaring Förklaring
showed an Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

become
Förklaring Förklaring
became Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

if
Förklaring Förklaring
if Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

was
Förklaring Förklaring
were Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Hello —
Förklaring Förklaring
Hello — Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

fine.
Förklaring Förklaring
well. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Philip
Förklaring Förklaring
Philip, Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

one
Förklaring Förklaring
a reader Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

readers.
Förklaring Förklaring
poetry magazine. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like your poetry magazine very much because
Förklaring Förklaring
enjoy it: Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

very
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Förklaring Förklaring
emotional, and reading them leaves me Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like
Förklaring Förklaring
appreciate Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers
Förklaring Förklaring
new writers Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers to
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

works. It
Förklaring Förklaring
work; that encouragement Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

to send
Förklaring Förklaring
about submitting Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

week,
Förklaring Förklaring
week Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

of my
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

through
Förklaring Förklaring
using Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

my
Förklaring Förklaring
the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

the submit button,
Förklaring Förklaring
“Submit,” Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

suddenly
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

became
Förklaring Förklaring
went Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

any
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

not sure if
Förklaring Förklaring
unsure whether Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

received or not.
Förklaring Förklaring
received. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

tell me about
Förklaring Förklaring
check Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

I worry that maybe
Förklaring Förklaring
I’m worried Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

did
Förklaring Förklaring
may Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

go
Förklaring Förklaring
have gone Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Thank you.
Förklaring Förklaring
Thank you. Förklaring: Grammatik.
Poängrapporter per kriterium

Uppgiftsuppfyllelse   5/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Övergripande struktur   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Relevans   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Grammatik   2/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Ordförråd   3/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Sammanhang   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Question:
In today's class, we'll explore the way people socialize and communicate in the digital age. The rise of social media and technology has led to more people choosing to socialize online rather than face-to-face. This has led to positive and negative impacts on our lives. So before the next class, I would like each of you to make a post on the following question: Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?

Få grammatikkorrigering


Exempel på grammatikkorrigeringar
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Lösning Förklaring
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Lösning Förklaring
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Lösning Förklaring
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Lösning Förklaring
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Lösning Förklaring
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Lösning Förklaring
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Lösning Förklaring
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Lösning Förklaring
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Lösning Förklaring
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Lösning Förklaring
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Lösning Förklaring
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Lösning Förklaring
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Lösning Förklaring
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Lösning Förklaring
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Lösning Förklaring
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Lösning Förklaring
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Lösning Förklaring
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Lösning Förklaring
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Lösning Förklaring
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Lösning Förklaring
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Lösning Förklaring
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Lösning Förklaring
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Skapa ett konto för att spara dina framsteg

Your professor is teaching a class on Media. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

Films serve as a window into the culture, values, and perspectives of the countries in which they were made. By watching movies from around the world, we can gain a deeper understanding of different societies and the stories they choose to tell. Here is a question for the discussion board: Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies?


Hey there, I've definitely learned a ton about Japanese culture through watching their films, particularly those from Studio Ghibli. Their movies have this unique animation style and intricate storytelling that just captivates me. Plus, the deep respect for nature they show in their films has given me a better appreciation for how important tradition and spirituality are in Japanese society.


Hey, I can see how you've learned a lot about Japan through Studio Ghibli movies, but I have to say that I don't think films always provide an accurate representation of a country's culture. I mean, movies are often created for entertainment purposes, and some aspects of the culture might be exaggerated or romanticized to appeal to audiences. So, while we can certainly get a glimpse into a country's culture through films, I believe we should be cautious about generalizing based on what we see in movies.

Word Count: 0

Registrera dig gratis för mer innehåll

Nyckelord i övningen
Ingen vokabulär är kopplad till denna övning

Få ditt essay betygsatt med grammatikkorrigeringar och en detaljerad poängrapport.

Få en writing-bedömning

Sample Writing Review

Poängsammanfattning
4.5 / 6
AI-bedömning
Uppgiftsuppfyllelse
Övergripande struktur
Relevans
Grammatik
Ordförråd
Sammanhang
Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
Forklaring till korrigeringarna

Korrigeringar i rott
Forslag pa akademiskt sprak i blatt

Detaljerad feedback

Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Uppgiftsuppfyllelse


Övergripande struktur


Relevans


Grammatik


Ordförråd


Sammanhang


cancel Grammatik

reader.
Förklaring Förklaring
readers. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

when
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

a
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

for
Förklaring Förklaring
to Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

make
Förklaring Förklaring
makes Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

confidence
Förklaring Förklaring
confident Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

by
Förklaring Förklaring
through Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

upload
Förklaring Förklaring
uploaded Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

click
Förklaring Förklaring
clicked the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

show
Förklaring Förklaring
showed an Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

become
Förklaring Förklaring
became Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

if
Förklaring Förklaring
if Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

was
Förklaring Förklaring
were Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Hello —
Förklaring Förklaring
Hello — Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

fine.
Förklaring Förklaring
well. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Philip
Förklaring Förklaring
Philip, Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

one
Förklaring Förklaring
a reader Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

readers.
Förklaring Förklaring
poetry magazine. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like your poetry magazine very much because
Förklaring Förklaring
enjoy it: Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

very
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Förklaring Förklaring
emotional, and reading them leaves me Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like
Förklaring Förklaring
appreciate Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers
Förklaring Förklaring
new writers Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers to
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

works. It
Förklaring Förklaring
work; that encouragement Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

to send
Förklaring Förklaring
about submitting Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

week,
Förklaring Förklaring
week Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

of my
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

through
Förklaring Förklaring
using Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

my
Förklaring Förklaring
the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

the submit button,
Förklaring Förklaring
“Submit,” Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

suddenly
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

became
Förklaring Förklaring
went Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

any
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

not sure if
Förklaring Förklaring
unsure whether Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

received or not.
Förklaring Förklaring
received. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

tell me about
Förklaring Förklaring
check Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

I worry that maybe
Förklaring Förklaring
I’m worried Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

did
Förklaring Förklaring
may Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

go
Förklaring Förklaring
have gone Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Thank you.
Förklaring Förklaring
Thank you. Förklaring: Grammatik.
Poängrapporter per kriterium

Uppgiftsuppfyllelse   5/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Övergripande struktur   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Relevans   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Grammatik   2/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Ordförråd   3/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Sammanhang   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Question:
Films serve as a window into the culture, values, and perspectives of the countries in which they were made. By watching movies from around the world, we can gain a deeper understanding of different societies and the stories they choose to tell. Here is a question for the discussion board: Films can tell us a lot about the country where they were made. What have you learned about a country from watching its movies?

Få grammatikkorrigering


Exempel på grammatikkorrigeringar
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Lösning Förklaring
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Lösning Förklaring
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Lösning Förklaring
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Lösning Förklaring
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Lösning Förklaring
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Lösning Förklaring
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Lösning Förklaring
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Lösning Förklaring
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Lösning Förklaring
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Lösning Förklaring
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Lösning Förklaring
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Lösning Förklaring
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Lösning Förklaring
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Lösning Förklaring
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Lösning Förklaring
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Lösning Förklaring
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Lösning Förklaring
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Lösning Förklaring
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Lösning Förklaring
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Lösning Förklaring
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Lösning Förklaring
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Lösning Förklaring
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Skapa ett konto för att spara dina framsteg

Your professor is teaching a class on Social Science. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

We all know that animals can be great companions. They provide us with comfort, joy, and love, and for some people, their pets are like members of their family. So, before the next class, I would like you to discuss this question: Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good?


Hey everyone, I believe that having a close relationship with a pet is good. Pets can provide us with emotional support and unconditional love, and they can also teach us important lessons such as responsibility and compassion. Many studies have shown that pets can improve our mental and physical health, and they can also help us to connect with other people who share our love for animals. I think that as long as pets are treated with kindness and respect, the relationships we have with them can be incredibly beneficial.


Hey, in my opinion, it depends on the person and the situation. While some people have positive and fulfilling relationships with their pets, others may use them as a substitute for human relationships or neglect them. Ultimately, the decision to have a close relationship with a pet should be made carefully and with consideration for both the pet and the owner.

Word Count: 0

Registrera dig gratis för mer innehåll

Nyckelord i övningen
Ingen vokabulär är kopplad till denna övning

Få ditt essay betygsatt med grammatikkorrigeringar och en detaljerad poängrapport.

Få en writing-bedömning

Sample Writing Review

Poängsammanfattning
4.5 / 6
AI-bedömning
Uppgiftsuppfyllelse
Övergripande struktur
Relevans
Grammatik
Ordförråd
Sammanhang
Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
Forklaring till korrigeringarna

Korrigeringar i rott
Forslag pa akademiskt sprak i blatt

Detaljerad feedback

Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Uppgiftsuppfyllelse


Övergripande struktur


Relevans


Grammatik


Ordförråd


Sammanhang


cancel Grammatik

reader.
Förklaring Förklaring
readers. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

when
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

a
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

for
Förklaring Förklaring
to Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

make
Förklaring Förklaring
makes Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

confidence
Förklaring Förklaring
confident Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

by
Förklaring Förklaring
through Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

upload
Förklaring Förklaring
uploaded Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

click
Förklaring Förklaring
clicked the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

show
Förklaring Förklaring
showed an Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

become
Förklaring Förklaring
became Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

if
Förklaring Förklaring
if Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

was
Förklaring Förklaring
were Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Hello —
Förklaring Förklaring
Hello — Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

fine.
Förklaring Förklaring
well. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Philip
Förklaring Förklaring
Philip, Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

one
Förklaring Förklaring
a reader Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

readers.
Förklaring Förklaring
poetry magazine. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like your poetry magazine very much because
Förklaring Förklaring
enjoy it: Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

very
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Förklaring Förklaring
emotional, and reading them leaves me Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like
Förklaring Förklaring
appreciate Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers
Förklaring Förklaring
new writers Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers to
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

works. It
Förklaring Förklaring
work; that encouragement Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

to send
Förklaring Förklaring
about submitting Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

week,
Förklaring Förklaring
week Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

of my
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

through
Förklaring Förklaring
using Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

my
Förklaring Förklaring
the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

the submit button,
Förklaring Förklaring
“Submit,” Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

suddenly
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

became
Förklaring Förklaring
went Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

any
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

not sure if
Förklaring Förklaring
unsure whether Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

received or not.
Förklaring Förklaring
received. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

tell me about
Förklaring Förklaring
check Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

I worry that maybe
Förklaring Förklaring
I’m worried Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

did
Förklaring Förklaring
may Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

go
Förklaring Förklaring
have gone Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Thank you.
Förklaring Förklaring
Thank you. Förklaring: Grammatik.
Poängrapporter per kriterium

Uppgiftsuppfyllelse   5/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Övergripande struktur   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Relevans   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Grammatik   2/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Ordförråd   3/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Sammanhang   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Question:
We all know that animals can be great companions. They provide us with comfort, joy, and love, and for some people, their pets are like members of their family. So, before the next class, I would like you to discuss this question: Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good?

Få grammatikkorrigering


Exempel på grammatikkorrigeringar
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Lösning Förklaring
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Lösning Förklaring
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Lösning Förklaring
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Lösning Förklaring
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Lösning Förklaring
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Lösning Förklaring
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Lösning Förklaring
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Lösning Förklaring
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Lösning Förklaring
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Lösning Förklaring
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Lösning Förklaring
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Lösning Förklaring
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Lösning Förklaring
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Lösning Förklaring
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Lösning Förklaring
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Lösning Förklaring
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Lösning Förklaring
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Lösning Förklaring
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Lösning Förklaring
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Lösning Förklaring
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Lösning Förklaring
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Lösning Förklaring
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

schedule10:00

For this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and some classmates have responded with their ideas.

Write a response that contributes to the discussion. You will have 10 minutes to write your response. It is important to use your own words in the response.

Typically, an effective essay will contain a minimum of 100 words, but we recommend writing around 150 words.

Skapa ett konto för att spara dina framsteg

Your professor is teaching a class on Personal experience. Write a post responding to the professor's question.

In your response you should:
  • express and support your opinion
  • make a contribution to the discussion

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.


Prof. Martin

As I mentioned in class, people often remember special gifts because they carry meanings beyond the objects themselves. A memorable present can signal care, mark a milestone, or change how we see a relationship. If you reflect on gifts you’ve received, which factor most explains why certain ones stand out—the giver, the timing, the surprise, usefulness, or symbolism? Why?


We remember certain gifts because they capture relationships and emotions in a concrete form. The object matters less than the intention, context, and message it carries. For me, the strongest factor is symbolism: a gift feels unforgettable when it mirrors who we are or who we hope to become. The real question is which symbolic cue—identity, commitment, or gratitude—makes a gift truly stick.


I disagree with Alex that symbolism is the strongest factor. Memorability often comes from emotional intensity at the moment of receiving, which is driven by surprise and timing. When anticipation is disrupted, attention spikes and the memory consolidates. Usefulness also reinforces recall through repeated interaction. Therefore, I think surprise and practical relevance, more than abstract meaning, explain why some gifts are remembered.

Word Count: 0

Registrera dig gratis för mer innehåll

Nyckelord i övningen
Ingen vokabulär är kopplad till denna övning

Få ditt essay betygsatt med grammatikkorrigeringar och en detaljerad poängrapport.

Få en writing-bedömning

Sample Writing Review

Poängsammanfattning
4.5 / 6
AI-bedömning
Uppgiftsuppfyllelse
Övergripande struktur
Relevans
Grammatik
Ordförråd
Sammanhang
Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
Forklaring till korrigeringarna

Korrigeringar i rott
Forslag pa akademiskt sprak i blatt

Detaljerad feedback

Grammatiska korrigeringar och feedback
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give chance for new writers to share their works. It make me more confidence to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by the online submission form on your website. After I upload my files and click submit button, the page suddenly show error and become blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure my poems was received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.
I hope you are fine. My name is Philip and I am one of your reader. readers. I really like your poetry magazine very much because the poems are very deep and emotional. Every time when I read the magazine, I feel inspired and peaceful. I also like that you give a chance for to new writers to share their works. It make makes me more confidence confident to send my poems.

Last week, I tried to submit two of my poems by through the online submission form on your website. After I upload uploaded my files and click clicked the submit button, the page suddenly show showed an error and become became blank. I did not receive any confirmation email, so I am not sure if my poems was were received or not.

Could you please tell me about the status of my submissions? I worry that maybe they did not go through.



Uppgiftsuppfyllelse


Övergripande struktur


Relevans


Grammatik


Ordförråd


Sammanhang


cancel Grammatik

reader.
Förklaring Förklaring
readers. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

when
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

a
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

for
Förklaring Förklaring
to Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

make
Förklaring Förklaring
makes Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

confidence
Förklaring Förklaring
confident Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

by
Förklaring Förklaring
through Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

upload
Förklaring Förklaring
uploaded Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

click
Förklaring Förklaring
clicked the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

show
Förklaring Förklaring
showed an Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

become
Förklaring Förklaring
became Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

if
Förklaring Förklaring
if Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Grammatik

was
Förklaring Förklaring
were Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Hello —
Förklaring Förklaring
Hello — Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

fine.
Förklaring Förklaring
well. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Philip
Förklaring Förklaring
Philip, Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

one
Förklaring Förklaring
a reader Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

readers.
Förklaring Förklaring
poetry magazine. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like your poetry magazine very much because
Förklaring Förklaring
enjoy it: Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

very
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

emotional. Every time I read the magazine, I feel
Förklaring Förklaring
emotional, and reading them leaves me Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

like
Förklaring Förklaring
appreciate Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers
Förklaring Förklaring
new writers Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

new writers to
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

works. It
Förklaring Förklaring
work; that encouragement Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

to send
Förklaring Förklaring
about submitting Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

week,
Förklaring Förklaring
week Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

of my
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

through
Förklaring Förklaring
using Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

my
Förklaring Förklaring
the Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

the submit button,
Förklaring Förklaring
“Submit,” Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

suddenly
Förklaring Förklaring
Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

became
Förklaring Förklaring
went Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

any
Förklaring Förklaring
a Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

not sure if
Förklaring Förklaring
unsure whether Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

received or not.
Förklaring Förklaring
received. Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

tell me about
Förklaring Förklaring
check Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

I worry that maybe
Förklaring Förklaring
I’m worried Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

did
Förklaring Förklaring
may Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

go
Förklaring Förklaring
have gone Förklaring: Grammatik.

cancel Förklaring

Thank you.
Förklaring Förklaring
Thank you. Förklaring: Grammatik.
Poängrapporter per kriterium

Uppgiftsuppfyllelse   5/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Övergripande struktur   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Relevans   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Grammatik   2/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Ordförråd   3/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Sammanhang   4/5

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring: Uppgiftsuppfyllelse. Övergripande struktur. Relevans. Grammatik. Ordförråd. Sammanhang.

Förklaring

Begär en bedömning för att se detta innehåll

...

Question:
As I mentioned in class, people often remember special gifts because they carry meanings beyond the objects themselves. A memorable present can signal care, mark a milestone, or change how we see a relationship. If you reflect on gifts you’ve received, which factor most explains why certain ones stand out—the giver, the timing, the surprise, usefulness, or symbolism? Why?

Få grammatikkorrigering


Exempel på grammatikkorrigeringar
Several doubt about the accuracy of the memoir writting by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading but the professor clarify the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.

Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
Several doubt doubts about the accuracy of the memoir writting written by the Chevalier de Seingalt are raised in the reading reading, but the professor clarify clarifies the seeming contradictions in the Chevalier's accounts to defend the memoir.

The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.

The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.

Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.



cancel Grammar Correction

doubt
Lösning Förklaring
doubts The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed.

cancel Grammar Correction

writting
Lösning Förklaring
written The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
reading, A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

clarify
Lösning Förklaring
clarifies The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

explain
Lösning Förklaring
explains The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

was
Lösning Förklaring
was The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'.

cancel Grammar Correction

its
Lösning Förklaring
his The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

selling. Accordingly,
Lösning Förklaring
sell. According The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

fund
Lösning Förklaring
funds The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

poors.
Lösning Förklaring
poor. The correct adjective form is 'poor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

reading
Lösning Förklaring
the reading, The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

borrowing
Lösning Förklaring
borrows The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation.

cancel Grammar Correction

of
Lösning Förklaring
The preposition 'of' is not needed here.

cancel Grammar Correction

wealth,
Lösning Förklaring
wealthy, The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

about
Lösning Förklaring
about The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

regards
Lösning Förklaring
regarding The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence.

cancel Grammar Correction

challenging
Lösning Förklaring
challenged The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice.

cancel Grammar Correction

the
Lösning Förklaring
the The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'.

cancel Grammar Correction

passing.
Lösning Förklaring
passed. The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense.

cancel Grammar Correction

refute
Lösning Förklaring
refutes The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'.

cancel Grammar Correction

briber
Lösning Förklaring
that bribery The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes.

cancel Grammar Correction

point
Lösning Förklaring
points The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'.

cancel Grammar Correction

prison
Lösning Förklaring
prison, A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses.

cancel Grammar Correction

existences
Lösning Förklaring
existence The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing.

cancel Grammar Correction

escaping
Lösning Förklaring
escape The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping.
writing LessonsCompleted: 0 / 77
TOEFL Academic Discussion Response Template

Your response should have three parts. This structure works for all five question types. About 90% of questions are either Opinion (~50%) or Choosing an Approach (~40%). The other types (Proposing a Solution, Problems and Solutions, Description and Explanation) are rare.

Step What to Write How Long
1 State your position 1–2 sentences. Clearly express your opinion, solution, or explanation. You can agree with a student, disagree, or offer a new perspective.
2 Support your position 3–5 sentences. This is the most important part. Provide a reason, example, or explanation that supports your position. Use specific details — not vague statements. The quality of this section has the biggest impact on your score.
3 Wrap up 1–2 sentences. Restate your main point or connect your idea back to the discussion. This step is optional if you are running out of time, but it helps your response feel complete.
Response Template

Here is a fill-in-the-blank template you can practice with. Adapt it to fit different topics.

Template:
Step 1 — Position: I agree/disagree with [student name]'s point that ______. While he/she makes a valid argument about ______, I believe that ______ is also an important factor to consider.

Step 2 — Support: For example, ______. This shows that ______. In addition, ______. As a result, ______.

Step 3 — Wrap up: For this reason, I believe that ______.

Note: This template is a starting point. You should adjust it based on the specific discussion topic. Do not memorize this template word for word. Instead, practice using different openings, transitions, and examples so your response sounds natural.

Useful Phrases for Your Response
Starting your response I think [student name] raises an excellent point, and I'd like to build on it by…
Both students make interesting arguments, but I'd like to offer a different perspective.
I strongly agree/disagree with [student name] because…
This is a thought-provoking question. In my view…
Introducing your main idea One important aspect that hasn't been mentioned is…
From my experience, I have found that…
A key reason I hold this view is…
To illustrate this point…
Providing examples For instance, in my country/school/workplace…
A clear example of this is…
Consider the case of…
In my high school/university, for example…
Connecting ideas Furthermore, …
This is significant because…
As a result, …
In other words, …
Concluding your response For these reasons, I believe that…
Therefore, …
In short, …
That is why I think…
Annotated Sample Response
Professor's question: This week, I'd like us to discuss government spending priorities. Some people believe that governments should invest more in environmental protections, while others think education should receive more funding. Which do you think should be a higher priority, and why?

Kelly: I think environmental protections should be the top priority. Climate change is already causing floods and droughts that cost governments billions of dollars. If we invest in the environment now, we can prevent much bigger costs in the future.

Andrew: I believe education is more important. Well-educated people are better equipped to solve environmental problems and develop new technologies. By investing in education, we are actually investing in solutions to all kinds of challenges, including environmental ones.

Sample response:

[Step 1 — Position] I agree with Andrew that education should be a higher priority, but I would like to add another reason that he did not mention. [Step 2 — Support] Universities do not just teach students — they also conduct important research. Much of the progress we have made in treating diseases, developing clean energy, and creating sustainable farming techniques has come from university research programs. When governments invest more in education, they are funding this research at the same time. This means education spending has a broader impact than environmental spending alone, because it produces solutions across many different fields. [Step 3 — Wrap up] For this reason, I believe that prioritizing education is the most effective way for governments to address environmental challenges and improve society as a whole.

What to notice:

  • Step 1 is short and clear — just one sentence that states the position and references Andrew.
  • Step 2 introduces a new idea (university research) with specific examples (diseases, clean energy, sustainable farming). This is the bulk of the response.
  • Step 3 ties the argument back to the professor's question about government spending priorities.
  • The response is ~130 words — concise but thorough.
Master the TOEFL Writing for an Academic Discussion Task

In this task, you will read an online discussion. A professor has posted a question about a topic, and two classmates have responded with their ideas. Your job is to write a response that contributes to the discussion.

You will have 10 minutes to write your response. A good response is around 120–130 words.

Based on official ETS questions, there are five types of question prompts. However, two types account for about 90% of all questions:

Type What You Do Frequency
Opinion You agree or disagree with a statement and explain why. ~50%
Choosing an Approach You pick between two options and explain why one is better. ~40%
Proposing a Solution You suggest a way to solve a problem. Rare
Problems and Solutions You identify a problem and propose a solution. Rare
Description and Explanation You explain why something is important or beneficial. Rare

The same response structure works for all five types. Let's look at tips to help you score high.

Tip 1: Read the discussion carefully before writing

Before you begin writing, take about 2 minutes to read the professor's question and both student responses carefully. Pay attention to:

  • The professor's question – What topic is being discussed? What specific question is the professor asking? Which question type is it?
  • Student A's opinion – What position does this student take? What reasons do they give?
  • Student B's opinion – Does this student agree or disagree with Student A? What different perspective do they offer?

Understanding all three posts helps you write a response that connects to what has already been said, which is important for a high score. Decide: Do you agree with a student, disagree, or have a different idea? Think of one specific example you can use.

Tip 2: Add something new — do not copy a student's ideas

Your response should clearly state your opinion on the topic. You can agree with one of the students, partially agree with both, or offer a completely different perspective. The key is to add something new to the discussion.

It is fine to agree with a student's viewpoint, but you must provide your own reasons and examples to support it. Do not repeat the same supporting points the student already gave.

Wrong approach Right approach
"I agree with Kelly. Climate change causes floods and droughts that cost billions. We should invest in the environment to prevent bigger costs later."

This just restates Kelly's argument in different words. It adds nothing new.
"I agree with Kelly that environmental protections should be a priority. Currently, governments spend enormous amounts repairing damage from storms and wildfires. Investing in prevention now — such as reforestation and cleaner energy — could save that money in the long run."

This agrees with Kelly but adds new details and a new angle.
Tip 3: Reference the other posts in your response

A strong response connects to the discussion. Briefly mention the professor's question or a student's idea before sharing your own thoughts. Your tone should be semi-formal: clear, respectful, and grammatically correct, but not stiff or overly academic.

Here are some useful phrases for referencing others:

Agreeing and building on it I agree with [name]'s point about…, and I would like to add…
[Name]'s perspective resonates with me because…
Building on what [name] said, I think…
I would like to add to [name]'s point about…
Disagreeing respectfully While I understand where [name] is coming from, I tend to see it differently…
I appreciate [name]'s viewpoint, but I hold a slightly different perspective…
I see [name]'s point, but from my perspective, it seems that…
I see the merit in [name]'s argument; however, I would argue that…
Adding a new perspective In addition to what has been discussed…
Another aspect worth considering is…
Neither student has mentioned…, which I think is important.
I'd like to offer a different angle on this topic.
Tip 4: Use correct grammar and varied vocabulary

Even though the Academic Discussion response is shorter than a full essay, grammar and vocabulary still matter. You should:

  • Use a variety of sentence structures (simple, compound, and complex sentences)
  • Avoid repeating the same words – use synonyms where possible
  • Check your subject-verb agreement and verb tenses
  • Use academic vocabulary when appropriate (e.g., "significant" instead of "big," "contribute" instead of "help")
  • Be specific. Replace vague statements like "Some students try hard but don't get good grades" with concrete details like "In my high school math class, a classmate studied for hours every day but still scored lower than students who found the subject easy."
Lesson: Countable nouns and Uncountable nouns
Lesson: Subject verb agreement rules
Lesson: Use the right article
Lesson: Relative pronouns and relative clauses

If you are a premium member, you will have up to 50 free essay grammar corrections.

Tip 5: Manage your time and length wisely

You have 10 minutes for this task. Here is a suggested time breakdown:

0:00–2:00 Read & Plan. Read the professor's question and both student posts. Decide your position and think of one specific example you can use.
2:00–8:00 Write. Follow the 3-step structure: state your position (1–2 sentences), support it with a reason and example (3–5 sentences), and wrap up (1–2 sentences).
8:00–10:00 Review. Check for grammar and spelling mistakes. Make sure you referenced the discussion and added your own ideas. Confirm your response is at least 100 words.

Target length: 120–130 words. Writing too little (under 100 words) means not enough content to evaluate. Writing too much (over 160 words) risks running out of time and introducing grammar errors. Stay focused: make one main point and support it well.

Tip: If you are running out of time at the 8-minute mark, skip the wrap-up sentence and use the remaining time to fix grammar errors instead. A shorter response with good grammar scores better than a longer one full of mistakes.

Subscribe to General