For this task, you will be presented with a situation and will need to write a personal response explaining the situation or requesting information about the situation in the form of an informal, semi-formal or formal letter.
This task assesses your ability to follow English letter-writing conventions (i.e. what order to put information in, what style to use, how to start and finish a letter), to use language accurately and appropriately and to organise and link information coherently and cohesively.
- - You should spend about 20 minutes on this part.
- - Write at least 150 words
You have a suggestion for a park near your apartment building.
Write a letter to your city's council board. In your letter:
- Describe who you are and what your suggestion is
- Explain why you think this suggestion will improve the park
- Detail when you would like to see this suggestion in action
Write at least 150 words. You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
Dear Councilor,
出现在此练习题的单字
相关单字
此练习题没有关联单字
获取作文批改与语法纠错,以及详细分数报告。
assignment
获取高级写作点评
写作批改范例
分数总览
AI 评审
评分标准反馈
优点
- 这封信回应了题目中的全部三个要点。
- 作者清楚地说明了对住房和周边地区的需求。
- 从开头就能很容易看出这封信的写作目的。
开头清楚地说明了情况:“I come to this city for work” 和 “My wife and two children come with me together.” 这涵盖了题目的第一个要点,因为作者既介绍了自己,也介绍了家人。读者很快就能明白谁会住在这套房子里。
题目的第二个要点也写到了。作者要求 “one floor in a tall building,” 说 “The apartment must be lower than 10 years old,” 还补充说公共服务要好。这些细节能帮助中介知道要找什么样的住房。
关于位置的要点也很清楚。作者想要的地方是 “near my working space,” “good elementary school,” “near subway station and shopping mall,” 并且靠近公园。这给了中介有用的方向。
不足之处- 有些观点没有充分展开,所以中介仍然需要猜测一些细节。
- 有几项要求不够清楚,或者解释得不够好。
- 语气大体合适,但有些句子作为正式请求听起来有点直接或不自然。
虽然所有要点都写到了,但有些部分需要更多支撑。例如,“one floor in a tall building is better” 说明了房子的类型,但没有清楚说明面积大小。中介仍然不知道这家人需要几间卧室或几间浴室。加一句简单的话,比如 “We need a three-bedroom apartment with two bathrooms”,会让这个要求更完整。
有些细节很难理解。“I don’t want to pay attention on house fixing and neighborhood” 这句话没有清楚表达具体的要求。作者似乎想要一套维护良好、位于安全安静地区的房子,但没有直接说出来。在 IELTS 的任务完成情况中,清楚的要求能帮助读者更好地回应。
价格这一点属于额外信息,它是有用的,但题目主要问的是房屋类型和位置。作者可以用这部分篇幅补充缺少的细节,比如房屋面积、租金范围或入住日期。
有几个说法语气太强,比如 “please check the neighbor quality.” 在正式信件中,语气委婉一些的请求效果更好。例如:“I would also prefer a quiet and safe neighbourhood.”
改进练习- 练习先为题目中的每个要点各写一个完整的句子,然后再添加额外的细节。
- 练习补充两个关于房子本身的具体细节,比如面积、房间数量或建筑类型。
- 把直接的要求改写成礼貌的正式请求。
练习 1:拿一道类似的题目,先只写三个句子。例如:“I am moving for work with my wife and two children. We are looking for a three-bedroom apartment in a modern building. We would prefer an area near downtown, a good school, and public transport.” 这能帮助你完整地回答每个要点。
练习 2:列一个关于住房细节的小清单:卧室、浴室、建筑类型、房龄、预算和入住日期。然后在信中至少用上其中四项。
练习 3:把语气太强的句子改成礼貌的说法。例如,把 “check the neighbor quality” 改成 “I would appreciate a home in a quiet and safe neighbourhood.”
语法多样性及准确性
优点
- 作者使用了几种不同的句型,而不只是非常短的简单句。
- 信中有些部分的语法是正确的。
- 即使语法不完全正确,意思通常也很清楚。
这封信既有简单的陈述句,也有带连接词的较长句子。例如,“In addition, if there is park near the location, it will be nice” 用了一个 if 从句。另一个例子是 “Although the convenience in downtown must be great...” 这显示出一定的语法多样性,因为作者尝试了不止一种语法结构。
有些基本句子足够准确,比如 “My office is in downtown” 和 “Price is not a concern.” 这些句子让信息保持易懂。
即使出现语法错误,读者通常也能看懂意思。这在 IELTS 中很重要,因为交流仍然实现了。
不足之处- 动词形式和句子结构经常出错。
- 冠词、介词和名词形式经常不正确。
- 有些句子连接得不好,造成了标点问题。
动词的使用是一个常见问题。作者写的是 “I come to this city for work” 和 “My wife and two children come with me together.” 因为这次搬家是计划好的,更好的形式是 “I am coming to this city for work” 或 “I will be moving to this city for work,” 以及 “My wife and two children will come with me.”
冠词经常缺失。例如,“good elementary school” 应该是 “a good elementary school,” 而 “if there is park” 应该是 “if there is a park.” 像这样的小语法词在这个评分标准中很重要。
介词也比较薄弱。“Near my working space” 能看懂,但 “near my workplace” 更正确。“Pay attention on house fixing” 应该是 “pay attention to house repairs,” 而 “in downtown” 根据句子的不同,用 “downtown” 或 “in the downtown area,” 会更好。
有些句子是用逗号连在一起的。例如 “I come to this city for work, to help my company build a new factory in here, I plan to stay one year.” 这里需要更好地控制句子。你可以这样拆分:“I am moving to your city for work. I will help my company build a new factory there, and I plan to stay for one year.”
还有词形和一致方面的问题,比如 “recommand” 和 “accomadation,” 当这些问题影响到句子的准确性时,也会影响语法。
改进练习- 练习写信时常用的现在时、将来时和表示计划动作的形式。
- 做一些关于冠词和介词的简短练习。
- 练习把长句拆分成两个清楚的句子。
练习 1:改写五个关于未来计划的句子。例如,把 “I come to this city for work” 改成 “I am moving to this city for work,” 把 “My family come with me” 改成 “My family will come with me.”
练习 2:填入缺少的小语法词。例如:“We need ___ apartment near ___ school and near ___ subway station.” 然后核对:“a,” “a,” “a.”
练习 3:从你的信中选一个长句,把它拆成两句。例如:“We prefer a modern apartment. It should be close to my office and a good school.” 这样能提高准确性。
词汇丰富程度(词汇)
优点
- 作者使用了足够多与住房和位置相关的话题词汇。
- 有些用词能帮助房产中介理解请求。
- 作者尝试使用不太常见的词,而不只是非常基础的词。
这封信使用了与题目相关的有用词汇,比如 “elementary school,” “public service,” “downtown,” “subway station,” “shopping mall,” “neighborhood,” 以及 “apartment.” 这些词符合找住房这个话题。
有些短语给中介提供了实用的信息。例如,“lower than 10 years old” 表明作者想要一套比较新的房子。“Price is not a concern” 也清楚地说明了预算情况。
作者还尝试用 “living quality” 和 “government building” 这样的短语来扩大用词范围。这说明作者在努力使用比非常简单的词汇更丰富的表达。
不足之处- 有几个用词不自然,或者不是最适合这个情境的词。
- 拼写错误降低了清晰度和准确性。
- 一些重复使用的简单词可以换成更合适的住房相关用语。
有些词汇能看懂,但在英语中不自然。例如,“my working space” 换成 “my workplace” 或 “my office.” 会更好。“Neighbor quality” 不是一个自然的短语。更好的选择是 “quiet neighbourhood” 或 “safe area.” “House fixing” 也比较弱;“repairs” 或 “maintenance” 更适合这个题目。
有几处拼写问题,包括把 “recommend” 写成 “recommand”,把 “accommodation” 写成 “accomadation.” 在 IELTS 词汇评分中,拼写很重要,因为它会影响用词的准确性。
有几个表达太模糊。“Nice public service” 意思不清楚。作者指的是公共交通、医疗服务,还是当地设施?更准确的用词会有帮助。例如:“We would prefer good public transport and nearby shops.”
“living quality” 这个短语能看懂,但 “quality of life” 才是常用的说法。学习像这样的常见词语搭配,会让信读起来更自然、更清楚。
改进练习- 建立一个关于住房、街区和交通的词汇表。
- 练习把不自然的短语换成常见的英语表达。
- 复习题目中关键词的正确拼写。
练习 1:分成三栏:住房、地区和交通。在住房一栏下,写 “apartment,” “bedroom,” “modern,” 和 “maintenance.” 这样的词。在地区一栏下,写 “quiet neighbourhood,” “safe area,” 和 “near a park.” 在交通一栏下,写 “subway station,” “bus stop,” 和 “public transport.” 然后在一封新信中每栏各用两个。
练习 2:替换你信中的短语。把 “working space” 改成 “workplace,” 把 “house fixing” 改成 “repairs,” 把 “neighbor quality” 改成 “safe and quiet neighbourhood.”
练习 3:抄写并检查 15 个常见 IELTS 信件词汇的拼写,比如 “accommodation,” “recommend,” “neighbourhood,” 和 “convenient.” 然后把每个词都用在一个完整的句子里。
连贯与衔接
优点
- 这封信整体顺序清楚。
- 主要观点被分成了不同的部分。
- 信中用了一些连接词在观点之间过渡。
这封信先介绍作者的情况和家人,然后讲位置方面的需求,接着是额外的偏好,最后以价格结尾。这个顺序比较容易理解。读者从第一段就能看出主要目的。
作者还把观点分成了几个短段落。一段解释搬家的原因。另一段说明对位置和建筑的需求。还有一段补充了额外的愿望,比如公园和交通。这有助于读者理解信的内容。
信中用了一些简单的连接词,比如 “In addition” 和 “Finally.” 这些词让要点之间的过渡更顺畅一些。
不足之处- 段落内部有些句子衔接得不够顺畅。
- 有几个连接词选得不好,或者容易让人困惑。
- 有些观点被放在一起,但内部没有清楚的顺序。
在第二段中,几个观点被挤在了一起:“near my working space,” “good elementary school,” “office is in downtown,” 和 “public service.” 这些内容都相关,但顺序感觉有点乱。更清楚的顺序是:先讲工作地点,然后是学校,再是交通,最后是建筑类型。
有些连接词用得不好。例如,“Although the convenience in downtown must be great, near subway station and shopping mall are always good for living quality.” 这句话以 “Although,” 开头,但对比没有完整表达出来。读者期待看到对比清楚的另一面。更好的写法是:“Downtown is convenient, but we would also like to live near a subway station and a shopping mall.”
句子之间的指代也比较弱。“one floor in a tall building is better” 出现在 “We prefer to have nice public service,” 之后,但两者之间的联系不清楚。公共服务和楼层选择是不同的观点。如果分开写,会更容易理解。
结尾补充了 “Price is not a concern,” 这一点有用,但出现得非常突然。如果用 “As for the budget” 或 “Regarding the cost.” 这样的短语引出,衔接会更好。
改进练习- 练习一个段落只写一个主要话题。
- 练习正确使用简单的连接词。
- 在写整封信之前,先列一个简短的提纲。
练习 1:写之前,先列出四个小标题:家庭、住房类型、位置和预算。每个标题下只放相关的细节。这能改善段落的顺序。
练习 2:用 “and,” “but,” “because,” 和 “also.” 这样的简单连接词改写较长的观点。例如:“We want to live near my office, and we also need a good school for our children.”
练习 3:从你的信中选一个段落,按重要程度从高到低给其中的观点编号。然后按这个顺序重写这一段。这样信的内容会更容易理解。
语法纠错
I come to this city for work, to help my company build a new factory in here, I plan to stay one year. My wife and two children come with me together.
I want the location near my working space and good elementary school for my children. My office is in downtown, beside your city government building. We prefer to have nice public service so one floor in a tall building is better.
In addition, if there is park near the location, it will be nice. We love to take a walk after dinner. Although the convenience in downtown must be great, near subway station and shopping mall are always good for living quality.
Finally, I don't want to pay attention on house fixing and neighborhood. The apartment must be lower than 10 years old, and please check the neighbor quality before you recommand it to me.
Price is not a concern, my company will pay for this accomadation.
Sincerely, Sam
I come to this city for work, to help my company build a new factory in here, here. I plan to stay one year. My wife and two children come with me together.
I want the location near my working space and a good elementary school for my children. My office is in downtown, beside your city government building. We prefer to have nice public service so one floor in a tall building is better.
In addition, if there is a park near the location, it will be nice. We love to take a walk after dinner. Although the convenience in downtown must be great, near subway station and shopping mall are always good for living quality.
Finally, I don't want to pay attention on to house fixing and neighborhood. The apartment must be lower less than 10 years old, and please check the neighbor quality before you recommand recommend it to me.
Price is not a concern, concern; my company will pay for this accomadation. accommodation.
Sincerely, Sam
改进建议
I come am coming to this your city for work, work to help assist my company build in building a new factory here. factory. I plan to stay for one year. My year, and my wife and two children come will be coming with me together. me.
I want the location near would like a residence that is close to my working space workplace and a good elementary school for my children. My office is in downtown, beside next to your city government building. We would prefer to have nice public service so a unit on one floor of the lower floors in a tall building is better. high-rise building, as we value the convenience and public services available in that area.
In addition, it would be ideal if there is were a park near the location, it will be nice. We love to take a walk nearby, as my family enjoys taking evening walks after dinner. Although the While downtown convenience in downtown must be great, near is important, we would also appreciate easy access to a subway station and a shopping mall are always good for living quality. mall, as these would improve our quality of life.
Finally, I don't want would like to pay attention to house fixing avoid concerns about repairs and the neighborhood. The apartment must should be less than 10 years old, and please I would appreciate it if you could carefully check the neighbor quality neighborhood before you recommend it recommending a property to me. us.
Price is not a concern; concern, as my company will pay for this accommodation. cover the accommodation expenses.
Sincerely, Sam
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| It | 句子开头第一个单词的首字母要大写。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| here. | 使用正确的介词和标点;“here” 本身就表示这个地方,所以不需要 “in”。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| a | 在 “factory” 前面加上冠词 “a”,因为它是单数可数名词。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| a | 加上了冠词 'a',让这个名词短语符合语法。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| to | 把 'on' 换成了 'to',因为这个动词需要搭配介词,构成 'pay attention to'。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| less | 把 'lower' 换成了 'less',因为在这个语境中 'years' 被当作不可数的量,应该用 'less' 来修饰。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| recommend | 这个词拼写错误。正确的拼写是 "recommend"。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| concern; | 这里用分号更合适,因为分号比逗号能更清楚地分隔两个独立分句。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| accommodation. | 这个词拼写错误。正确的拼写是 "accommodation"。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| am coming | 这里把动词改成了现在进行时,在正式英语中,用它来表达计划好的将来动作更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| your | "Your" 更合适,因为作者是在礼貌地指收信人所在的城市,而不是用指示词 "this." |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| work | 去掉了这个逗号,因为它不必要地打断了句子,去掉后表达更顺畅。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| assist | "Assist" 是比 "help," 更正式的选择,更适合正式信件。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| in building | 这样改让 "assist," 后面的结构正确,因为在正式英语中我们说 "assist in doing something"。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| factory. | 去掉了 "here" 这个词,因为从上下文已经能清楚知道地点,去掉后句子听起来更简洁。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| for | 加上了 "For",让这个短语在语法上完整,并且自然地表达目的。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| year, and my | 加上了一个逗号和一个连词,让两个相关的观点衔接得更顺畅,避免句子显得断断续续。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| will be coming | 这里改变了动词形式,表示计划好的将来动作,这样更清楚、更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| me. | "Together" 是多余的,因为 "with me" 已经表示陪同,所以去掉它会让句子更简洁。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| would like a residence that is close to | 在正式信件中,这是表达请求的一种更正式、更礼貌的方式。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| workplace | 这里 "Workplace" 是正确且更自然的说法;在这个语境中,"working space" 不是地道的表达。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 这里不需要这个介词;去掉它会让句子更顺畅,语法也正确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| next to | 在这个语境中,“Next to” 是表达位置很近的一种更自然、更正式的方式。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| would | 加上 “would” 会让句子更礼貌,更适合正式的请求。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| a unit on | 这个替换把别扭的短语改成了更清楚的表达,具体说明了想要的公寓类型。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| of the lower floors | 这个补充说明了在楼里偏好的楼层,让句子更准确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| high-rise building, as we value the convenience and public services available in that area. | 这个修改使用了更自然的正式措辞,并更清楚地解释了这样偏好的原因。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| it would be ideal | 这个补充让请求听起来更有礼貌、更得体。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| were | 在 “if,” 后面需要用 “Were” 来表示虚拟语气,这在这个假设性的句子中更正确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| nearby, as my family enjoys taking evening walks | 这是表达同样意思的一种更顺畅、更正式的方式,句子更流畅,语气也更好。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| While downtown | 在这个句子中,“While downtown” 更简洁、更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| is important, we would also appreciate easy access to a | 这样改提高了语法正确性和正式程度,让句子更清楚、更礼貌。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| a | 在后面的单数名词前,必须加上冠词,语法才正确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| mall, as these would improve our quality of life. | 原来的短语很别扭,而且语法不正确。换成更自然的表达,会让句子听起来正式而清楚,而且 'quality of life' 比 'living quality.' 更合适。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| would like | 对于正式信件来说,'Don't want' 太直接,也太消极。提出请求时,'Would like' 更礼貌、更合适。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| avoid concerns about repairs | 这个措辞在英语中不自然。修改后的短语说明公寓不应该有需要操心维修的问题,更清楚、更正式地表达了原本想说的意思。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the | 在句中特指的名词短语前,需要用冠词 'the',语法才正确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| should | 'Must' 在这里听起来太强硬、太绝对。在正式信件中礼貌地提出建议或偏好时,用 'Should' 更合适。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| I would appreciate it if you could carefully | 'Please' 是礼貌的,但这个替换让请求听起来更正式、更尊重对方,更适合正式信件。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| neighborhood | 'Neighbor quality' 不是自然的英语。正确的词是 'neighborhood,' 指的是这个地区及其整体环境。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| recommending a property | 原来的短语很别扭,也太直接。请别人推荐公寓时,修改后的措辞更正式、更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| us. | 这里需要用 'Us',因为作者指的是全家人,而不只是他自己。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| concern, as | 这里用分号不正确,因为第二个分句是在解释第一个分句。用逗号加 'as' 能让衔接更顺畅,语法也正确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| cover the accommodation expenses. | 这个短语更正式、更自然。'Cover the accommodation expenses' 是表达公司会支付住房费用的一种专业说法。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 信件正文中不应该改动寄信人的名字。这里删掉它,可能是为了符合想要的格式,或者避免在最终版本中重复。 |
评分标准报告
任务完成情况 6/9
• 写作目的总体清楚;语气可能前后不一致
• 呈现并较为充分地突出关键特征/要点,但细节可能无关、不恰当或不准确
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 全面回应题目的所有部分 • 针对题目提出充分展开的立场,观点相关、充分扩展且论证有力 |
| 8 | • 充分回应题目的所有部分 • 针对题目作出展开良好的回应,观点相关、有所扩展且有论据支撑 |
| 7 | • 满足题目的要求 • 写作目的清楚,语气一致且得体 • 清楚地呈现并突出关键特征/要点,但还可以更充分地展开 |
| 6 | • 回应了题目的要求 • 写作目的总体清楚;语气可能前后不一致 • 呈现并较为充分地突出关键特征/要点,但细节可能无关、不恰当或不准确 |
| 5 | • 总体上回应了题目;格式在某些地方可能不恰当 • 信件的写作目的有时可能不清楚;语气可能多变,有时不恰当 • 呈现了关键特征/要点,但涵盖不充分;可能倾向于关注细节 |
| 4 | • 尝试回应题目,但没有涵盖所有关键特征/要点;格式可能不恰当 • 没有清楚说明信件的写作目的;语气可能不恰当 • 可能把关键特征/要点与细节混淆;部分内容可能不清楚、无关、重复 |
| 3 | • 没有充分回应题目的任何部分 • 没有表达清楚的立场 • 提出的观点很少,而且大多没有展开或 与题目无关 |
| 2 | • 几乎没有回应题目 • 没有表达立场 • 可能尝试提出一两个观点,但没有展开 |
| 1 | • 回答与题目完全无关 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
语法多样性及准确性 5/9
• 尝试使用复杂句,但复杂句往往不如简单句准确
• 可能经常出现语法错误,标点也可能有误;错误会给读者造成一定困难
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 使用丰富多样的句子结构,运用完全灵活且准确;极少出现轻微错误,且仅属于 ‘笔误’ |
| 8 | • 使用丰富多样的句子结构 • 大多数句子没有错误 • 只是非常偶尔地出现错误或不恰当之处 |
| 7 | • 使用多种复杂结构 • 经常写出没有错误的句子 • 能很好地掌握语法和标点,但可能出现少量错误 |
| 6 | • 混合使用简单句和复杂句 • 语法和标点方面有一些错误,但很少影响 交流 |
| 5 | • 只使用有限的句子结构 • 尝试使用复杂句,但复杂句往往不如简单句准确 • 可能经常出现语法错误,标点也可能有误;错误会给读者造成一定困难 |
| 4 | • 只使用非常有限的句子结构,很少使用从句 • 有些结构是准确的,但错误占多数,标点也经常出错 |
| 3 | • 尝试使用一些句式,但语法和标点错误占多数,并且歪曲了意思 |
| 2 | • 除了背诵的短语外,无法使用句式 |
| 1 | • 完全无法使用句式 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
词汇丰富程度(词汇) 5/9
• 可能在拼写和/或构词方面出现明显错误,可能给读者造成一定困难
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 使用丰富的词汇,对词汇特征的掌握非常自然、成熟;极少出现轻微错误,且仅属于 ‘笔误’ |
| 8 | • 使用丰富的词汇 • 流利、灵活地表达准确的含义 • 能熟练使用不常见的词汇,但在用词和搭配上偶尔可能不准确 • 很少出现拼写 和/或构词错误 |
| 7 | • 使用的词汇足够丰富,能表现出一定的灵活性和准确性 • 使用不太常见的词汇,并对文体和搭配有一定意识 • 在用词、拼写和/或构词方面可能偶尔出错 |
| 6 | • 使用的词汇范围足以完成题目 • 尝试使用不太常见的词汇,但有些不准确 • 在拼写和/或构词方面有一些错误,但这些错误 不妨碍交流 |
| 5 | • 使用的词汇范围有限,但基本足以完成题目 • 可能在拼写和/或构词方面出现明显错误,可能给读者造成一定困难 |
| 4 | • 只使用基础词汇,可能重复使用,或者可能不适合题目 • 对构词和/或拼写的掌握有限;错误可能让读者读起来吃力 |
| 3 | • 只使用非常有限的单词和表达,对构词和/或拼写的掌握非常有限 • 错误可能严重歪曲 要表达的信息 |
| 2 | • 使用的词汇极其有限;基本上无法掌握构词和/或拼写 |
| 1 | • 只能使用几个孤立的单词 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
连贯与衔接 6/9
• 有效地使用衔接手段,但句内和/或句间的衔接可能有误或显得机械
• 指代可能不总是清楚
或恰当
会分段,但分段不总是
合乎逻辑
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 衔接自然,不会引起读者注意 • 能熟练地安排段落 |
| 8 | • 按逻辑顺序安排信息和观点 • 能很好地处理衔接的各个方面 • 充分而恰当地分段 |
| 7 | • 有逻辑地组织信息和观点;全文推进清楚 • 恰当地使用多种衔接手段,尽管可能存在 一些使用不足或过度使用的情况;在每个段落中 都呈现清楚的中心话题 |
| 6 | • 连贯地安排信息和观点,整体推进清楚 • 有效地使用衔接手段,但句内和/或句间的衔接可能有误或显得机械 • 指代可能不总是清楚 或恰当 会分段,但分段不总是 合乎逻辑 |
| 5 | • 呈现信息时有一定的组织,但可能缺乏 整体推进 • 衔接手段使用不足、不准确或过度使用 • 由于缺少指代和替换,可能显得重复 • 可能没有分段,或者分段可能不充分 |
| 4 | • 呈现了信息和观点,但没有连贯地组织,而且 回答中没有清楚的推进 • 使用了一些基本的衔接手段,但可能不准确或重复 • 可能没有分段,或者 分段方式可能让人困惑 |
| 3 | • 没有按逻辑组织观点 • 可能只使用非常有限的衔接手段,而且所用的衔接手段可能 无法表明观点之间的逻辑关系 |
| 2 | • 几乎无法掌握组织 结构 |
| 1 | • 无法传达任何信息 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
请成立帐号以申请批改。
You have a suggestion for a park near your apartment building.
Write a letter to your city's council board. In your letter:
- Describe who you are and what your suggestion is
- Explain why you think this suggestion will improve the park
- Detail when you would like to see this suggestion in action
Write at least 150 words. You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
Dear Councilor,
示例语法批改
The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.
Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.
Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for his assets to sell. According to the professor, being low on cash funds is not the same as being financially poor. However, in the reading, someone who borrows large amounts of money could not be wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passed.
Finally, the professor refutes the idea that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| doubts | The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| written | The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| reading, | A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| clarifies | The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| explains | The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| was | The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| his | The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| sell. According | The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| funds | The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| poor. | The correct adjective form is 'poor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the reading, | The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| borrows | The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| The preposition 'of' is not needed here. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| wealthy, | The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| about | The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| regarding | The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| challenged | The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| passed. | The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| refutes | The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| that bribery | The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| points | The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| prison, | A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| existence | The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| escape | The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping. |