The Writing Task 2 of the IELTS Academic/General test requires you to write an essay in response to a point of view, argument or problem. You will be presented with a topic and will be tested on your ability to respond by giving and justifying an opinion, discussing the topic, summarizing details, outlining problems, identifying possible solutions and supporting what you write with reasons, arguments and relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
- - Write in a formal style
- - Write at least 250 words
Write about the following topic:
There seems to be an increasing amount of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed.Discuss both sides.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
出现在此练习题的单字
相关单字
此练习题没有关联单字
获取作文批改与语法纠错,以及详细分数报告。
assignment
获取高级写作点评
写作批改范例
分数总览
AI 评审
评分标准反馈
优点
- 这篇文章回答了题目的两个部分。
- 主要原因清楚,并且始终与话题相关。
- 对社会的影响表达得很清楚,并且和原因联系在一起。
- 作者补充了一个符合话题的实用想法。
这篇文章清楚地聚焦于刑满释放人员为什么会再次犯罪。在第一个主体段中,作者用 “social prejudice” 和 “rejection that criminals naturally suffer.” 这样的短语来解释原因。这直接回答了关于原因的问题。
对社会的影响也表达得很直接。“the increase of violence rates” 这句话说明了重复犯罪带来的一个清楚的社会后果。这让文章始终和题目联系在一起,因为题目问的是对社会的影响,而不只是对罪犯本人的影响。
文章还提出了一个有用的应对想法。关于 “public policies” 以及帮助企业雇用刑满释放人员的句子很好地支持了讨论。这不是题目的主要任务,但仍然符合话题,也说明作者理解这个问题。
结尾的个人例子也支持了重新融入社会是可行的这一观点。它让关于原因和影响的讨论更真实,尽管这个例子展开得不是很充分。
不足之处- 对原因的解释比较狭窄,只展开了一个主要原因。
- 写到了对社会的影响,但没有充分探讨。
- 有些部分偏离了原因和影响这个重点。
- 结尾没有完整地总结主要观点。
文章的大部分内容只围绕一个主要原因展开:出狱后被排斥。这一点是相关的,但题目问的是 “causes,” 所以如果再加上另一个清楚的原因,回答会更有力,比如教育程度低、出狱后缺乏支持,或者与以前的犯罪团伙有联系。可以简单地加一句:“Another cause is the lack of training and support after release, so many people feel they have no legal way to start again.”
文章提到了对社会的影响,但写得很简短。“Increase of violence rates” 是一个合理的影响,但文章可以进一步说明对社会的更多后果,比如社区里的恐惧、警察面临的压力,或者更多的公共开支。例如:“This can make neighborhoods less safe and force the government to spend more money on prisons and policing.”
关于政府行动的段落是合理的,但它稍微偏离了这篇文章的主要任务。题目主要要求写原因和影响。写一两句是可以的,但应该把更多篇幅用来展开题目要求的回答。
最后一段是一个个人故事,但它更像是一个额外的例子,而不是一个有力的结论。更清楚的结尾可以重新表述回答的两个部分。例如:“In short, rejection after prison can push people back into crime, and this harms society by increasing danger and social costs.”
改进练习- 练习在写作之前先规划两个原因和两个影响。
- 写一个简短的结论,重复你的主要原因和主要影响。
- 做一个聚焦题目的练习,只写关于原因和影响的句子。
写作之前,先快速画一个两栏的表格:原因和影响。针对这个话题,在每一栏写两个观点。这能帮助你更完整地回答两个部分。
练习写两句话的结论。第一句重新表述原因。第二句重新表述对社会的影响。保持简短、直接。
拿这个话题,只写六个句子:一句引言、两句写原因、两句写影响、一句结论。这能帮助你紧紧围绕题目的要求。
语法多样性及准确性
优点
- 文章混合使用了简单句和复杂句。
- 大多数句子清楚、容易理解。
- 作者能掌握连接方面的语法,比如表示原因和结果的从句。
- 动词形式经常用得正确。
文章中有较长的句型,而不只是简短的基础句子。例如,“once released from prison, usually go back to crime, as they come through enormous obstacles” 用了一个时间短语和一个原因从句。这显示出一定的语法多样性。
文章还很好地使用了表示原因和结果的语法。“The rejection that criminals naturally suffer... causes them to seek opportunities” 这句话在这类题目中语法很有力,因为它清楚地把原因和影响连接了起来。
定语从句和补充信息也用得很好。在 “individuals who served a prison sentence,” 中,“who served a prison sentence” 正确地用来限定这一群体。这让文章听起来更准确。
动词形式大多掌握得很好。像 “he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional” 这样的句子容易理解,而且大体准确。
不足之处- 一些介词和词形错误让句子不够自然。
- 在冠词、复数和句子形式方面有语法错误。
- 有几个句子太长,变得更难控制。
- 最后一段在时态使用上有一些错误。
有几个语法问题来自固定短语和介词。例如,“reintegrated to society” 不如 “reintegrated into society.” 准确。另外,“difficulty to be professionally reallocated” 改成 “difficulty finding work” 或 “difficulty being employed.” 会更好。这些错误不妨碍理解意思,但会降低准确性。
还有一些冠词和形式上的小问题。“Does not have easy solution” 应该是 “does not have an easy solution.” “Government should create” 写成 “The government should create.” 会显得更完整。这些都是 IELTS 中常见的语法点。
有些长句包含了太多观点。例如,以 “The immediate effect of this reality is that...” 开头的句子能看懂,但它变得很沉重,更难控制。用较短的句子能减少错误。更清楚的写法可以是:“This situation pushes many ex-prisoners back into crime. As a result, violence in society may increase.”
在最后一段中,“he had also become a good citizen” 和其他动词的时间顺序不太一致。更好的写法是:“he also became a good citizen” 或 “he has also become a good citizen.” 这样时态模式会更清楚。
改进练习- 练习关键词后面常见的介词搭配。
- 把长句改写成两个较短的句子。
- 做一些关于冠词和动词时态的修改练习。
列出这个话题的常用短语,比如 “reintegrate into society,” “return to crime,” 和 “be released from prison.” 每个短语用新句子写三遍。这能提高你在介词方面的语法准确性。
从你的文章中选两个长句,把每个句子拆成两个较短的句子。检查意思是否仍然清楚。这能帮助你在考试条件下更好地控制准确性。
做一个关于冠词和时态的简短改错练习。例如,把 “Government should create public policies” 改成 “The government should create public policies.” 然后把 “he had also become” 改成 “he also became.”
词汇丰富程度(词汇)
优点
- 文章使用了与犯罪和重新融入社会相关的话题词汇。
- 用词有一定的变化。
- 作者尝试用不太常见的词汇来解释这个问题。
- 词汇经常有助于清楚地表达原因和影响。
文章用了很多符合话题的词,比如 “recidivism,” “offenders,” “released from prison,” 和 “crime underworld.” 这些词与题目相关,让回答听起来重点突出。
作者在指代同一群体时也用了一些不同的说法。文章用了 “criminals,” “offenders,” 和 “individuals who served a prison sentence.” 这避免了过多重复,显示出较好的词汇范围。
文章还用了表示社会问题和感受的词,比如 “social prejudice,” “rejected,” 和 “raise awareness.” 这些用词有助于解释刑满释放人员为什么可能再次犯罪。
有几处词汇很好地支持了原因和影响的结构。例如,“causes them to seek opportunities” 和 “encouraging the return to crime” 清楚地表明了观点之间的关系。
不足之处- 有些用词很别扭,或者在英语中不自然。
- 有几个词意思用对了,但搭配较弱。
- 有拼写错误。
- 有些短语太正式或太沉重,降低了清晰度。
有时作者选的词能看懂,但不自然。例如,“professionally reallocated” 不是谈论找工作的常用说法。这里用 “Find a job” 或 “return to the workforce” 会更合适。
还有一些较弱的词语搭配。在这个句子中,“Come through enormous obstacles” 不是最好的搭配。更自然的选择是 “face enormous obstacles.” 另外,“apply for job offers” 应该是 “apply for jobs.” 这些修改会让词汇更准确。
一些拼写错误降低了词汇使用的质量。例如 “environenments,” “sytem,” 和 “violance.” 这些错误不妨碍理解,但会降低整体用词的掌握程度。
有几个短语太沉重,让意思不够直接。“Penitentiary system” 是可以接受的,但在这篇文章中,“prison system” 会更清楚、更自然。清楚准确的词汇通常比非常正式的措辞效果更好。
改进练习- 建立一个包含自然搭配的话题词库。
- 用你自己文章中的词做拼写复习。
- 练习把沉重的短语换成更清楚的说法。
为这个话题做一个词汇表。在一栏里写名词,比如 “crime,” “prison,” 和 “prejudice.” 在下一栏加上自然的搭配,比如 “commit a crime,” “be sent to prison,” 和 “face prejudice.” 这能提高你的搭配能力。
把你文章中拼错的词抄下来,每个词正确地写五遍:“environments,” “system,” 和 “violence.” 然后把每个词用在一个新句子里。
把你文章中的正式短语用更简单的英语改写。例如,把 “professionally reallocated” 改成 “find work,” 把 “penitentiary system” 改成 “prison system.” 这会让你的词汇更清楚、更自然。
连贯与衔接
优点
- 文章的段落结构清楚。
- 主要观点通常按逻辑顺序排列。
- 文章用连接词来表示递进、结果和对比。
- 大多数句子都清楚地围绕重复犯罪这个话题。
文章分成了清楚的几个部分。第一段引出问题。第二段解释原因。第三段转向影响和可能的措施。最后一段举了一个例子。这让文章整体上很容易理解。
观点的推进方向也合乎逻辑。作者先讲重新融入社会的问题,然后解释被排斥和找工作的困难,再说明对社会造成的结果。这个顺序很好地支撑了一篇原因与影响类的文章。
连接词在几个地方让行文更流畅。文章用了 “Furthermore,” “Besides,” “because of,” “consequently,” 和 “On top of that.” 这些词表明了观点之间的联系,引导读者跟上讨论。
指代词也有助于衔接。例如,“this reality” 和 “such individuals” 指回前面的观点,所以作者不需要经常重复同样的名词。
不足之处- 有些分段方式对这道题来说效果不够好。
- 有几个连接词用得有些勉强,或者不太清楚。
- 最后一段不是一个有力的结论。
- 有些句子包含了太多观点,所以行文显得沉重。
文章是有组织的,但第三段把影响和解决办法混在了一起。既然题目问的是原因和影响,更清楚的做法是用一个主体段写原因,另一个主体段只写影响。然后最后一段可以给出一个简短的结论。
文章用了一些连接词,但用法并不总是最好的。例如,“Besides offering them means of survival, there are psychological effects” 作为衔接有点别扭。读者必须停下来想清楚两者的联系。更简单的衔接是:“This group gives them money, and it also gives them a feeling of acceptance.”
最后一段感觉像是一个额外的例子,而不是完整的结尾。读完之后,文章就结束了,没有对主要原因和主要影响做清楚的最后总结。这削弱了回答的整体结构。
有几个句子塞进了太多观点。例如,关于 “the general prejudice towards those who came from the penitentiary system” 的长句把原因、结果和评论放在了一起。把它拆开会让行文更流畅。例如:“Society often judges former prisoners. This can push them back into crime and increase violence.”
改进练习- 练习在写作前先列一个简单的四段式提纲。
- 把一个内容混杂的段落改写成只有一个清楚的目的。
- 练习用两个总结句写简短的结论。
写作之前,先记下四个段落各自的任务:引言、原因、影响、结论。然后在每个部分只放相符的观点。这会让你的文章结构更清楚。
拿你的第三段,把影响和解决办法分开。写一个只有影响的版本。这个练习能帮助你保持段落的重点。
针对同一个话题写三个简短的结论。每个结论只写两句话。第一句总结原因。第二句总结对社会的影响。
语法纠错
The rejection that criminals naturally suffer when trying to be reinserted in society and to apply for job offers causes them to seek opportunities in the same environments where they felt at ease prior to their imprisonment, the crime underworld. Besides offering them means of survival, there are psychological effects in such environenments, given that their previous criminal partners tend to welcome them better than does society in general.
The immediate effect of this reality is that, because of the general prejudice towards those who came from the penitentiary sytem, society involuntarily ends up encouraging the return to crime and, consequently, the increase of violance rates. It is however a problem that does not have easy solution. Government should create public policies aiming at stimulating companies to hire such individuals and engage in campaigns to raise awareness among people not to reject them previously.
Personally, some years ago I knew a person who had served a four-year period in jail and, after his release, he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional. On top of that, he had also become a good citizen and started a family. Today, he is fully reintegrated to society.
The rejection that criminals naturally suffer when trying to be reinserted in society and to apply for job offers causes them to seek opportunities in the same environments where they felt at ease prior to their imprisonment, the crime underworld. Besides offering them means of survival, there are psychological effects in such environenments, environments, given that their previous criminal partners tend to welcome them better than does society in general.
The immediate effect of this reality is that, because of the general prejudice towards those who came from the penitentiary sytem, system, society involuntarily ends up encouraging the return to crime and, consequently, the increase of violance violence rates. It is however is, however, a problem that does not have an easy solution. Government should create public policies aiming at stimulating companies to hire such individuals and engage in campaigns to raise awareness among people not to reject them previously.
Personally, some years ago I knew a person who had served a four-year period in jail and, after his release, he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional. On top of that, he had also become a good citizen and started a family. Today, he is fully reintegrated to society.
改进建议
The rejection that former criminals naturally suffer often experience when trying to be reinserted in rejoin society and to apply for job offers causes jobs leads many of them to seek opportunities in the same environments where they felt at ease prior to their imprisonment, accepted before prison: the crime criminal underworld. Besides offering them a means of survival, there these environments also have a psychological impact, since their former criminal associates are psychological effects in such environments, given that their previous criminal partners tend to welcome them better usually more welcoming than does society in general. at large.
The immediate effect of this reality is that, because of the general widespread prejudice towards those against people who came from have been through the penitentiary prison system, society involuntarily ends up encouraging the unintentionally encourages their return to crime and, consequently, the increase of violence rates. It is, in violence. This is not, however, a problem that does not have an easy solution. Government can be easily solved. The government should create public policies aiming at stimulating to encourage companies to hire such these individuals and engage in launch campaigns to raise awareness among people not to reject them previously. and reduce prejudice against them.
Personally, some years ago I knew a person who had served a four-year period four years in jail prison and, after his release, he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional. On top of that, he had He also become became a good citizen and started a family. Today, he is fully reintegrated to into society.
词汇提升
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| environments, | 拼写纠正:这个词应该是 "environments," 而不是 "environenments,"。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| system, | "sytem" 这个词拼写错误。正确的拼写是 "system," 这样句子在语法上才正确。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| violence | 这个词拼写错误。正确的拼写是 “violence.” |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| is, however, | “however” 后面需要加逗号,因为它是一个用来打断句子的连接副词。 |
cancel 语法纠正
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| an | 加上了冠词 “an”,因为它位于元音音素前,这样短语在语法上才正确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| serious | 这里用 "Serious" 更自然,因为它以正式、恰当的方式描述这个问题。"Worrying" 能看懂,但 "serious" 更符合学术文章的文体。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| in the reintegration of former | 这个替换让短语更准确、更正式。原来的措辞很别扭,而新的措辞清楚地指出了前罪犯重返社会的过程。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| into | 指进入或回到某个群体或地方时,正确的介词是 "into"。"Reintegrated into society" 是自然的表达。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 删掉这个短语是为了让句子更直接,语法更顺畅。周围的词已经表达了这个意思,所以它是多余的。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| A | 这个修改删掉了不必要的引导短语,让句子更简洁。直接以 "A" 开头更自然,也不那么重复。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| return | 这里 "Return" 是一个更简单、更正式的动词。它避免了重复,在学术语境中听起来更合适。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| crime because | 在这个句子中,"Because" 比 "as" 表达的因果关系更清楚。它让他们这样做的原因更容易理解。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| face major | 在这个语境中,"Face major" 是正确且更自然的表达。原来的短语在英语中不地道。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| being | 这个修改纠正了句子的语法结构。"Being" 比 "be normally." 更符合这个结构。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| In addition, people | "In addition, people" 比 "Furthermore, individuals." 听起来更自然,也不那么正式。它在保持意思不变的同时也提高了可读性。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| have | 需要动词 "have" 才能让句子在语法上完整。没有它,句子就缺少一个正确的动词短语。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 这个冠词在这个表达中是多余的,会让短语不够自然。删掉它能改善语法和流畅度。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| sentences often | 单数名词被换成了复数结构,更符合所讨论的意思。"Sentences often" 也让句子读起来更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| great | 这里 "Great" 是更合适的形容词,因为它表达的意思更强烈、更自然。原来的短语很别扭,也不够地道。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| finding employment | "Finding employment" 是描述找到工作的正确而自然的短语。"Professionally reallocated" 在英语中不自然,也不太符合语境。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| former | 需要用 "Former" 来说明句子指的是过去曾经犯罪的人,这让短语更准确、更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| often experience | 这里 "Often experience" 听起来更合适,因为它描述的是一种常见的结果,而不会暗示被排斥是罪犯本身固有的或天生的特点。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| rejoin | 在英语中,"Rejoin" 是表示重返社会的更简短、更自然的动词,而 "be reinserted in" 别扭且不自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 这个词在这个结构中是多余的,所以删掉它能让语法更通顺。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| jobs leads many of | 这个修改让因果关系更清楚、更符合语法,从而改善了句子结构。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| accepted before prison: | 这个修改用更自然的短语代替了别扭的表达,让意思更清楚、更直接。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| criminal | 这里 "Criminal" 是正确的形容词,因为它能恰当地修饰 "underworld"。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| a | 在 "criminal underworld" 前面需要加冠词 "a",名词短语在语法上才完整。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| these environments also have a psychological impact, since their former criminal associates | 这个替换直接说明了这些环境在心理上对他们产生影响,并解释了他们为什么会被重新吸引回去,从而让意思更清楚。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| usually more welcoming | 这个短语被简化了,用了一个更符合语境的比较表达,变得更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 这个词是多余的,会破坏句子的语法结构,所以应该删掉。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| at large. | 这里 "At large" 是表示整个社会的正确表达。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| widespread | 描述影响很多人的偏见时,"Widespread" 是一个更有力、更准确的形容词。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| against people | 在这个语境中,"Against people" 更自然,也能更好地表达针对刑满释放人员的偏见。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| have been through | 指服刑这样的经历时,"Have been through" 是更自然的说法。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| prison | 在这个语境中,“Prison” 是英语里更自然、更常用的词,而 “penitentiary” 在这里听起来更正式、不太自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| unintentionally encourages their | 这个修改用了更直接、更自然的表达。“Unintentionally encourages” 比 “involuntarily ends up encouraging the.” 更清楚、更简洁。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| in violence. This is not, | “Increase of violence rates” 在英语中很别扭,所以用 “in violence” 听起来更自然。增加的对比也让句子更流畅。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| can be easily solved. The government | 这个修改使用了正确的主语和更清楚的被动结构,让句子更符合语法、更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| to encourage | 在这个语境中,“To encourage” 比 “aiming at stimulating” 更简单、更地道。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| these | “These” 更合适,因为它直接指正在讨论的这些人,而 “such” 在这里不够准确。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| launch | “Launch” 是表示发起活动的更好的动词,而 “engage in” 太笼统,也不够自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| and reduce prejudice against them. | 这个修改把意思表达得更清楚、更自然,重点放在减少偏见上,而不是用 “not to reject them previously.” 这个别扭的短语。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| four years | “Four years” 比 “a four-year period.” 更简洁、更自然。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| prison | 在这个语境中,尤其是指服刑时,“Prison” 是更标准的说法。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 这里不需要这个词,删掉它可以避免重复,让句子更流畅。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| 这个词在短语中是多余的,删掉它能纠正时态,让句子更顺畅。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| He | 这个短语被简化了,让句子更直接,并避免了别扭的过渡。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| became | 需要用过去时 “became”,因为这个句子描述的是过去已经完成的动作。 |
cancel 改进建议
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| into | “Into” 是和 “reintegrated,” 搭配的正确介词,这样短语在语法上才正确。 |
评分标准报告
任务回应 6/9
• 提出相关的立场,但结论可能变得不清楚或重复
• 提出相关的主要观点,但有些观点可能展开不充分/不清楚
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 全面回应题目的所有部分 • 针对题目提出充分展开的立场,观点相关、充分扩展且论证有力 |
| 8 | • 充分回应题目的所有部分 • 针对题目作出展开良好的回应,观点相关、有所扩展且有论据支撑 |
| 7 | • 回应题目的所有部分 • 在整个回答中立场清楚 • 提出、扩展并支持主要观点,但可能有过度概括的倾向,和/或支持性观点可能不够集中 |
| 6 | • 回应题目的所有部分,但有些部分可能比其他部分涵盖得更充分 • 提出相关的立场,但结论可能变得不清楚或重复 • 提出相关的主要观点,但有些观点可能展开不充分/不清楚 |
| 5 | • 只部分回应了题目;格式在某些地方可能不恰当 • 表达了立场,但论述并不总是清楚,而且可能没有得出结论 • 提出了一些主要观点,但这些观点有限,展开不充分;可能有无关的细节 |
| 4 | • 只是最低限度地回应题目,或者回答偏离主题;格式可能不恰当 • 提出了立场,但不清楚 • 提出了一些主要观点,但这些观点很难辨认,而且可能重复、无关或缺乏充分支持 |
| 3 | • 没有充分回应题目的任何部分 • 没有表达清楚的立场 • 提出的观点很少,而且大多没有展开或 与题目无关 |
| 2 | • 几乎没有回应题目 • 没有表达立场 • 可能尝试提出一两个观点,但没有展开 |
| 1 | • 回答与题目完全无关 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
语法多样性及准确性 6/9
• 语法和标点方面有一些错误,但很少影响
交流
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 使用丰富多样的句子结构,运用完全灵活且准确;极少出现轻微错误,且仅属于 ‘笔误’ |
| 8 | • 使用丰富多样的句子结构 • 大多数句子没有错误 • 只是非常偶尔地出现错误或不恰当之处 |
| 7 | • 使用多种复杂结构 • 经常写出没有错误的句子 • 能很好地掌握语法和标点,但可能出现少量错误 |
| 6 | • 混合使用简单句和复杂句 • 语法和标点方面有一些错误,但很少影响 交流 |
| 5 | • 只使用有限的句子结构 • 尝试使用复杂句,但复杂句往往不如简单句准确 • 可能经常出现语法错误,标点也可能有误;错误会给读者造成一定困难 |
| 4 | • 只使用非常有限的句子结构,很少使用从句 • 有些结构是准确的,但错误占多数,标点也经常出错 |
| 3 | • 尝试使用一些句式,但语法和标点错误占多数,并且歪曲了意思 |
| 2 | • 除了背诵的短语外,无法使用句式 |
| 1 | • 完全无法使用句式 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
词汇丰富程度(词汇) 6/9
• 尝试使用不太常见的词汇,但有些不准确
• 在拼写和/或构词方面有一些错误,但这些错误
不妨碍交流
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 使用丰富的词汇,对词汇特征的掌握非常自然、成熟;极少出现轻微错误,且仅属于 ‘笔误’ |
| 8 | • 使用丰富的词汇 • 流利、灵活地表达准确的含义 • 能熟练使用不常见的词汇,但在用词和搭配上偶尔可能不准确 • 很少出现拼写 和/或构词错误 |
| 7 | • 使用的词汇足够丰富,能表现出一定的灵活性和准确性 • 使用不太常见的词汇,并对文体和搭配有一定意识 • 在用词、拼写和/或构词方面可能偶尔出错 |
| 6 | • 使用的词汇范围足以完成题目 • 尝试使用不太常见的词汇,但有些不准确 • 在拼写和/或构词方面有一些错误,但这些错误 不妨碍交流 |
| 5 | • 使用的词汇范围有限,但基本足以完成题目 • 可能在拼写和/或构词方面出现明显错误,可能给读者造成一定困难 |
| 4 | • 只使用基础词汇,可能重复使用,或者可能不适合题目 • 对构词和/或拼写的掌握有限;错误可能让读者读起来吃力 |
| 3 | • 只使用非常有限的单词和表达,对构词和/或拼写的掌握非常有限 • 错误可能严重歪曲 要表达的信息 |
| 2 | • 使用的词汇极其有限;基本上无法掌握构词和/或拼写 |
| 1 | • 只能使用几个孤立的单词 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
连贯与衔接 6/9
• 有效地使用衔接手段,但句内和/或句间的衔接可能有误或显得机械
• 指代可能不总是清楚
或恰当
会分段,但分段不总是
合乎逻辑
| 分数 | 总体报告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 衔接自然,不会引起读者注意 • 能熟练地安排段落 |
| 8 | • 按逻辑顺序安排信息和观点 • 能很好地处理衔接的各个方面 • 充分而恰当地分段 |
| 7 | • 有逻辑地组织信息和观点;全文推进清楚 • 恰当地使用多种衔接手段,尽管可能存在 一些使用不足或过度使用的情况;在每个段落中 都呈现清楚的中心话题 |
| 6 | • 连贯地安排信息和观点,整体推进清楚 • 有效地使用衔接手段,但句内和/或句间的衔接可能有误或显得机械 • 指代可能不总是清楚 或恰当 会分段,但分段不总是 合乎逻辑 |
| 5 | • 呈现信息时有一定的组织,但可能缺乏 整体推进 • 衔接手段使用不足、不准确或过度使用 • 由于缺少指代和替换,可能显得重复 • 可能没有分段,或者分段可能不充分 |
| 4 | • 呈现了信息和观点,但没有连贯地组织,而且 回答中没有清楚的推进 • 使用了一些基本的衔接手段,但可能不准确或重复 • 可能没有分段,或者 分段方式可能让人困惑 |
| 3 | • 没有按逻辑组织观点 • 可能只使用非常有限的衔接手段,而且所用的衔接手段可能 无法表明观点之间的逻辑关系 |
| 2 | • 几乎无法掌握组织 结构 |
| 1 | • 无法传达任何信息 |
| 0 | • 缺考 • 完全没有尝试完成题目 • 写的是完全背诵的内容 |
请成立帐号以申请批改。
Write about the following topic:
There seems to be an increasing amount of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed.Discuss both sides.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
示例语法批改
The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.
Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.
Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for his assets to sell. According to the professor, being low on cash funds is not the same as being financially poor. However, in the reading, someone who borrows large amounts of money could not be wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passed.
Finally, the professor refutes the idea that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| doubts | The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| written | The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| reading, | A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| clarifies | The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| explains | The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| was | The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| his | The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| sell. According | The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| funds | The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| poor. | The correct adjective form is 'poor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the reading, | The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| borrows | The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| The preposition 'of' is not needed here. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| wealthy, | The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| about | The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| regarding | The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| challenged | The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| passed. | The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| refutes | The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| that bribery | The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| points | The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| prison, | A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| existence | The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 解释 |
|---|---|
| escape | The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping. |