For this task, you will be presented with a situation and will need to write a personal response explaining the situation or requesting information about the situation in the form of an informal, semi-formal or formal letter.
This task assesses your ability to follow English letter-writing conventions (i.e. what order to put information in, what style to use, how to start and finish a letter), to use language accurately and appropriately and to organise and link information coherently and cohesively.
- - You should spend about 20 minutes on this part.
- - Write at least 150 words
You and your family are moving to another country for work, and you are looking to buy a house there.
Write a letter to a property agent. In your letter:
- Introduce yourself and your family
- Describe the type of accommodation that you hope to find
- Give your preference for the location of the accommodation
Write at least 150 words. You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
To Whom it May Concern,
ఈ అభ్యాసంలోని కీలక పదాలు
సంబంధిత పదాలు
ఈ అభ్యాసానికి అనుసంధానమైన పదసంపద లేదు
వ్యాకరణ దిద్దుబాట్లు మరియు వివరమైన స్కోర్ నివేదికతో మీ వ్యాసాన్ని గ్రేడ్ చేయించుకోండి.
assignment
ఒక ప్రీమియం రైటింగ్ సమీక్షను పొందండి
Sample Writing Review
స్కోర్ సారాంశం
AI సమీక్ష
ప్రమాణాలపై అభిప్రాయం
Strengths
- The letter answers all three main points from the task.
- The writer gives clear needs about the home and the area.
- The purpose of the letter is easy to understand from the start.
The opening explains the situation clearly: “I come to this city for work” and “My wife and two children come with me together.” This covers the first task point, because the writer introduces both himself and his family. The reader can quickly understand who will live in the home.
The second task point is also covered. The writer asks for “one floor in a tall building,” says “The apartment must be lower than 10 years old,” and adds that public service should be good. These details help the agent know what kind of accommodation to look for.
The location point is also clear. The writer wants a place “near my working space,” “good elementary school,” “near subway station and shopping mall,” and near a park. This gives the agent useful direction.
Weaknesses- Some ideas are not fully developed, so the agent still has to guess some details.
- A few requests are unclear or not well explained.
- The tone is mostly suitable, but some lines sound a little direct or unnatural for a formal request.
Although all bullet points are included, some parts need more support. For example, “one floor in a tall building is better” tells the type of home, but it does not explain size clearly. The agent still does not know how many bedrooms or bathrooms the family needs. A simple line like “We need a three-bedroom apartment with two bathrooms” would make the request more complete.
Some details are hard to understand. The line “I don’t want to pay attention on house fixing and neighborhood” does not clearly show the exact request. It seems the writer wants a well-kept home in a safe, quiet area, but this is not said directly. In IELTS Task Achievement, clear requests help the reader respond better.
The price point is extra information, and it is useful, but the main task asked more about home type and location. The writer could use that space to add missing details such as home size, rent range, or move-in date.
A few phrases sound too strong, such as “please check the neighbor quality.” In a formal letter, a softer request works better. For example: “I would also prefer a quiet and safe neighbourhood.”
Exercises for Improvement- Practice writing one full sentence for each bullet point in the task before adding extra details.
- Practice adding two specific details about the home itself, such as size, number of rooms, or building type.
- Rewrite direct requests into polite formal requests.
Exercise 1: Take a task like this and write only three sentences first. Example: “I am moving for work with my wife and two children. We are looking for a three-bedroom apartment in a modern building. We would prefer an area near downtown, a good school, and public transport.” This helps you fully answer every point.
Exercise 2: Make a small checklist for accommodation details: bedrooms, bathrooms, building type, age, budget, and move-in date. Then use at least four in your letter.
Exercise 3: Change strong lines into polite ones. For example, change “check the neighbor quality” to “I would appreciate a home in a quiet and safe neighbourhood.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy
Strengths
- The writer uses several sentence types, not only very short simple sentences.
- There is some correct grammar in parts of the letter.
- Meaning is usually clear even when grammar is not fully correct.
The letter includes simple statements and longer sentences with linking words. For example, “In addition, if there is park near the location, it will be nice” shows an if-clause. Another example is “Although the convenience in downtown must be great...” This shows some range, because the writer tries more than one grammar pattern.
Some basic sentences are accurate enough, such as “My office is in downtown” and “Price is not a concern.” These help the message stay understandable.
Even when grammar mistakes appear, the reader can usually follow the meaning. This is important in IELTS, because communication still happens.
Weaknesses- There are frequent mistakes with verb forms and sentence structure.
- Articles, prepositions, and noun forms are often incorrect.
- Some sentences are joined badly, which causes punctuation problems.
Verb use is a common problem. The writer says “I come to this city for work” and “My wife and two children come with me together.” Because this move is planned, better forms would be “I am coming to this city for work” or “I will be moving to this city for work,” and “My wife and two children will come with me.”
Articles are often missing. For example, “good elementary school” should be “a good elementary school,” and “if there is park” should be “if there is a park.” Small grammar words like these matter in this criterion.
Prepositions are also weak. “Near my working space” is understandable, but “near my workplace” is more correct. “Pay attention on house fixing” should be “pay attention to house repairs,” and “in downtown” is better as “downtown” or “in the downtown area,” depending on the sentence.
Some sentences are run together with commas. This appears in “I come to this city for work, to help my company build a new factory in here, I plan to stay one year.” This needs better control. You could split it like this: “I am moving to your city for work. I will help my company build a new factory there, and I plan to stay for one year.”
There are also problems with word form and agreement, such as “recommand” and “accomadation,” but those also affect grammar when they interrupt sentence accuracy.
Exercises for Improvement- Practice present, future, and planned-action forms for letter writing.
- Do short drills on articles and prepositions.
- Practice splitting long sentences into two clear sentences.
Exercise 1: Rewrite five sentences about future plans. Example: change “I come to this city for work” to “I am moving to this city for work” and “My family come with me” to “My family will come with me.”
Exercise 2: Fill in missing small grammar words. Example: “We need ___ apartment near ___ school and near ___ subway station.” Then check: “a,” “a,” “a.”
Exercise 3: Take one long sentence from your letter and cut it into two. For example: “We prefer a modern apartment. It should be close to my office and a good school.” This builds better accuracy.
Lexical Resource (Vocabulary)
Strengths
- The writer uses enough topic words for housing and location.
- Some vocabulary choices help the property agent understand the request.
- The writer attempts less common words, not only very basic ones.
The letter uses useful words connected to the task, such as “elementary school,” “public service,” “downtown,” “subway station,” “shopping mall,” “neighborhood,” and “apartment.” These words fit the topic of finding accommodation.
Some phrases give practical meaning to the agent. For example, “lower than 10 years old” shows the writer wants a newer property. “Price is not a concern” also gives clear information about budget.
The writer also tries wider word choice with phrases like “living quality” and “government building.” This shows an attempt to move beyond very simple vocabulary.
Weaknesses- Several word choices are unnatural or not the best fit for this situation.
- Spelling mistakes reduce clarity and accuracy.
- Some repeated simple words could be replaced with more suitable housing language.
Some vocabulary is understandable but not natural in English. For example, “my working space” would be better as “my workplace” or “my office.” “Neighbor quality” is not a natural phrase. A better choice is “quiet neighbourhood” or “safe area.” “House fixing” is also weak; “repairs” or “maintenance” fits this task much better.
There are several spelling problems, including “recommand” for “recommend” and “accomadation” for “accommodation.” In IELTS vocabulary, spelling matters because it affects how accurately words are used.
A few expressions are too vague. “Nice public service” is not clear. Does the writer mean public transport, health services, or local facilities? More exact words would help. For example: “We would prefer good public transport and nearby shops.”
The phrase “living quality” is understandable, but “quality of life” is the normal phrase. Learning common word partnerships like this will make the letter sound more natural and clear.
Exercises for Improvement- Build a word list for housing, neighbourhood, and transport.
- Practice replacing unnatural phrases with common English ones.
- Review common spelling of key task words.
Exercise 1: Make three columns: home, area, and transport. Under home, write words like “apartment,” “bedroom,” “modern,” and “maintenance.” Under area, write “quiet neighbourhood,” “safe area,” and “near a park.” Under transport, write “subway station,” “bus stop,” and “public transport.” Then use two from each column in a new letter.
Exercise 2: Replace phrases from your letter. Change “working space” to “workplace,” “house fixing” to “repairs,” and “neighbor quality” to “safe and quiet neighbourhood.”
Exercise 3: Copy and check the spelling of 15 common IELTS letter words, such as “accommodation,” “recommend,” “neighbourhood,” and “convenient.” Then write each one in a full sentence.
Coherence & Cohesion
Strengths
- The letter has a clear overall order.
- Main ideas are grouped into separate parts.
- Some linking words are used to move between ideas.
The letter begins with the writer’s situation and family, then moves to location needs, then extra preferences, and ends with price. This order is easy enough to follow. The reader can see the main purpose from the first paragraph.
The writer also separates ideas into short paragraphs. One paragraph explains the move. Another explains location and building needs. Another adds extra wishes like a park and transport. This helps the reader follow the message.
Simple linking words are used, such as “In addition” and “Finally.” These give some help with the flow between points.
Weaknesses- Some sentences do not connect smoothly inside the paragraph.
- A few linking choices are weak or confusing.
- Some ideas are placed together without a clear internal order.
In the second paragraph, several ideas are pushed together: “near my working space,” “good elementary school,” “office is in downtown,” and “public service.” These are all related, but the order feels a little mixed. A clearer order would be: first workplace, then school, then transport, then building type.
Some connectors are not used well. For example, “Although the convenience in downtown must be great, near subway station and shopping mall are always good for living quality.” This sentence starts with “Although,” but the contrast is not fully finished. The reader expects a clear second side of the contrast. A better version is: “Downtown is convenient, but we would also like to live near a subway station and a shopping mall.”
There is also some weak reference between sentences. “one floor in a tall building is better” comes after “We prefer to have nice public service,” but the connection is not clear. Public services and floor choice are different ideas. They would be easier to follow if written separately.
The ending adds “Price is not a concern,” which is useful, but it comes very suddenly. It would connect better with a phrase like “As for the budget” or “Regarding the cost.”
Exercises for Improvement- Practice making one paragraph for one main topic only.
- Practice using simple connectors correctly.
- Make a short plan before writing the full letter.
Exercise 1: Before writing, make four mini-headings: family, type of home, location, and budget. Put only related details under each heading. This will improve paragraph order.
Exercise 2: Rewrite long ideas with simple connectors like “and,” “but,” “because,” and “also.” For example: “We want to live near my office, and we also need a good school for our children.”
Exercise 3: Take one paragraph from your letter and number the ideas from most important to least important. Then rewrite it in that order. This will make the message easier to follow.
వ్యాకరణ సవరణలు
I come to this city for work, to help my company build a new factory in here, I plan to stay one year. My wife and two children come with me together.
I want the location near my working space and good elementary school for my children. My office is in downtown, beside your city government building. We prefer to have nice public service so one floor in a tall building is better.
In addition, if there is park near the location, it will be nice. We love to take a walk after dinner. Although the convenience in downtown must be great, near subway station and shopping mall are always good for living quality.
Finally, I don't want to pay attention on house fixing and neighborhood. The apartment must be lower than 10 years old, and please check the neighbor quality before you recommand it to me.
Price is not a concern, my company will pay for this accomadation.
Sincerely, Sam
I come to this city for work, to help my company build a new factory in here, here. I plan to stay one year. My wife and two children come with me together.
I want the location near my working space and a good elementary school for my children. My office is in downtown, beside your city government building. We prefer to have nice public service so one floor in a tall building is better.
In addition, if there is a park near the location, it will be nice. We love to take a walk after dinner. Although the convenience in downtown must be great, near subway station and shopping mall are always good for living quality.
Finally, I don't want to pay attention on to house fixing and neighborhood. The apartment must be lower less than 10 years old, and please check the neighbor quality before you recommand recommend it to me.
Price is not a concern, concern; my company will pay for this accomadation. accommodation.
Sincerely, Sam
మెరుగుదల సూచనలు
I come am coming to this your city for work, work to help assist my company build in building a new factory here. factory. I plan to stay for one year. My year, and my wife and two children come will be coming with me together. me.
I want the location near would like a residence that is close to my working space workplace and a good elementary school for my children. My office is in downtown, beside next to your city government building. We would prefer to have nice public service so a unit on one floor of the lower floors in a tall building is better. high-rise building, as we value the convenience and public services available in that area.
In addition, it would be ideal if there is were a park near the location, it will be nice. We love to take a walk nearby, as my family enjoys taking evening walks after dinner. Although the While downtown convenience in downtown must be great, near is important, we would also appreciate easy access to a subway station and a shopping mall are always good for living quality. mall, as these would improve our quality of life.
Finally, I don't want would like to pay attention to house fixing avoid concerns about repairs and the neighborhood. The apartment must should be less than 10 years old, and please I would appreciate it if you could carefully check the neighbor quality neighborhood before you recommend it recommending a property to me. us.
Price is not a concern; concern, as my company will pay for this accommodation. cover the accommodation expenses.
Sincerely, Sam
పదసంపద మెరుగుదల
సహాయక వివరాల రచనా నాణ్యత
ప్రతి అంశానికి మీ పాఠకుడికి అవసరమైన నిర్దిష్ట వివరాలను జోడించండి.
Task Achievement — Letter
టాస్క్లోని ప్రతి భాగాన్ని కవర్ చేసే లేఖ రాసే మీ సామర్థ్యాన్ని మెరుగుపరచుకోండి.
Sentence Variety
వేర్వేరు వాక్య నిర్మాణాలను ఉపయోగించి మీ సమాధానంలోని కొన్ని వాక్యాలను మళ్లీ రాయండి.
ఇంగ్లీష్ వ్యాకరణం: Articles
మీ రచనలో articles ను ఉపయోగించడంలో మీకు మరింత అభ్యాసం అవసరం కావచ్చని మేము గమనించాము.
పదసంపద
మరింత ఉన్నత స్థాయి పదాలతో అభ్యాసం చేసి మీ పదసంపద స్కోర్ను పెంచుకోండి.
Writing పొందిక
మీ రచన సులభంగా అర్థమయ్యేలా ఆలోచనలను క్రమబద్ధీకరించే మీ సామర్థ్యాన్ని మెరుగుపరచుకోండి.
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| It | Capitalize the first word at the beginning of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| here. | Use the correct preposition and punctuation; “here” already means this place, so “in” is unnecessary. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| a | Add the article “a” before “factory” because it is a singular countable noun. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| a | Added the article 'a' to make the noun phrase grammatically correct. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| to | Replaced 'on' with 'to' because the verb requires the preposition 'pay attention to'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| less | Replaced 'lower' with 'less' because 'years' is an uncountable quantity in this context and should be modified by 'less'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| recommend | The word is misspelled. The correct spelling is "recommend". |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| concern; | A semicolon is more appropriate here because it separates two independent clauses more clearly than a comma. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| accommodation. | The word is misspelled. The correct spelling is "accommodation". |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| am coming | This changes the verb to the present continuous, which is more natural for a planned future action in formal English. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| your | "Your" is more appropriate because the writer is referring politely to the recipient’s city, not using the demonstrative "this." |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| work | The comma is removed because it interrupts the sentence unnecessarily and makes the phrasing smoother. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| assist | "Assist" is a more formal choice than "help," which better suits a formal letter. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| in building | This creates the correct structure after "assist," since we say "assist in doing something" in formal English. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| factory. | The word "here" is removed because the location is already clear from the context and the sentence sounds more concise without it. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| for | "For" is added to make the phrase grammatically complete and to show purpose in a natural way. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| year, and my | A comma and conjunction are added to connect the two related ideas more smoothly and avoid a choppy sentence. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| will be coming | This changes the verb form to show a planned future action, which is clearer and more natural here. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| me. | "Together" is unnecessary because "with me" already implies accompaniment, so removing it makes the sentence more concise. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| would like a residence that is close to | This is a more formal and polite way to express a request in a formal letter. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| workplace | "Workplace" is the correct and more natural term here; "working space" is not idiomatic in this context. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| The preposition is unnecessary here; removing it makes the sentence smoother and grammatically correct. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| next to | “Next to” is a more natural and formal way to express close location in this context. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| would | Adding “would” makes the sentence more polite and appropriate for a formal request. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| a unit on | This replacement changes the awkward phrase into a clearer expression that specifies the type of apartment desired. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| of the lower floors | This addition clarifies the preferred level in the building and makes the sentence more precise. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| high-rise building, as we value the convenience and public services available in that area. | This revision uses more natural formal wording and explains the reason for the preference more clearly. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| it would be ideal | This addition makes the request sound more courteous and polished. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| were | “Were” is needed for the subjunctive mood after “if,” which is more correct in this hypothetical statement. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| nearby, as my family enjoys taking evening walks | This is a smoother and more formal way to express the same idea, with better sentence flow and tone. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| While downtown | “While downtown” is more concise and natural in this sentence. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| is important, we would also appreciate easy access to a | This improves grammar and formality, and makes the sentence clearer and more polite. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| a | Adding the article is necessary for correct grammar before the singular noun that follows. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| mall, as these would improve our quality of life. | The original phrase is awkward and grammatically incorrect. Replacing it with a more natural expression makes the sentence sound formal and clear, and 'quality of life' is more appropriate than 'living quality.' |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| would like | 'Don't want' is too direct and negative for a formal letter. 'Would like' is more polite and appropriate for making a request. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| avoid concerns about repairs | This wording is unnatural in English. The revised phrase expresses the intended meaning more clearly and formally by stating that the apartment should not require repair concerns. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed for grammatical correctness before a specific noun phrase in the sentence. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| should | 'Must' sounds too strong and absolute here. 'Should' is more appropriate when making a polite recommendation or preference in a formal letter. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| I would appreciate it if you could carefully | 'Please' is polite, but this replacement makes the request sound more formal and respectful, which is better suited to a formal letter. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| neighborhood | 'Neighbor quality' is not natural English. The correct word is 'neighborhood,' which refers to the area and its overall environment. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| recommending a property | The original phrase is awkward and direct. The revised wording is more formal and natural when asking someone to suggest an apartment. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| us. | 'Us' is needed because the writer is referring to the whole family, not only himself. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| concern, as | A semicolon is incorrect here because the second clause explains the first. A comma with 'as' creates a smoother and grammatically correct connection. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| cover the accommodation expenses. | This phrase is more formal and natural. 'Cover the accommodation expenses' is a professional way to say the company will pay for housing. |
cancel Improvement Suggestion
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| The sender's name should not be changed in the letter itself. Removing it here likely reflects the desired formatting or avoids duplication in the final version. |
ప్రమాణ స్కోర్ నివేదికలు
Task Achievement 6/9
• presents a purpose that is generally clear; there may be inconsistencies in tone
• presents and adequately highlights key features/bullet points but details may be irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate
| Score | General Report |
|---|---|
| 9 | • fully addresses all parts of the task • presents a fully developed position in answer to the question with relevant, fully extended and well supported ideas |
| 8 | • sufficiently addresses all parts of the task • presents a well-developed response to the question with relevant, extended and supported ideas |
| 7 | • covers the requirements of the task • presents a clear purpose, with the tone consistent and appropriate • clearly presents and highlights key features/bullet points but could be more fully extended |
| 6 | • addresses the requirements of the task • presents a purpose that is generally clear; there may be inconsistencies in tone • presents and adequately highlights key features/bullet points but details may be irrelevant, inappropriate or inaccurate |
| 5 | • generally addresses the task; the format may be inappropriate in places • may present a purpose for the letter that is unclear at times; the tone may be variable and sometimes inappropriate • presents, but inadequately covers, key features/bullet points; there may be a tendency to focus on detail |
| 4 | • attempts to address the task but does not cover all key features/bullet points; the format may be inappropriate • fails to clearly explain the purpose of the letter; the tone may be inappropriate • may confuse key features/bullet points with detail; parts may be unclear,irrelevant, rep |
| 3 | • does not adequately address any part of the task • does not express a clear position • presents few ideas, which are largely undeveloped or irrelevant |
| 2 | • barely responds to the task • does not express a position • may attempt to present one or two ideas but there is no development |
| 1 | • answer is completely unrelated to the task |
| 0 | • does not attend • does not attempt the task in any way • writes a totally memorised response |
Grammatical Range and Accuracy 5/9
• attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences
• may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader
| Score | General Report |
|---|---|
| 9 | • uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’ |
| 8 | • uses a wide range of structures • the majority of sentences are error-free • makes only very occasional errors or inappropriacies |
| 7 | • uses a variety of complex structures • produces frequent error-free sentences • has good control of grammar and punctuation but may make a few errors |
| 6 | • uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms • makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication |
| 5 | • uses only a limited range of structures • attempts complex sentences but these tend to be less accurate than simple sentences • may make frequent grammatical errors and punctuation may be faulty; errors can cause some difficulty for the reader |
| 4 | • uses only a very limited range of structures with only rare use of subordinate clauses • some structures are accurate but errors predominate, and punctuation is often faulty |
| 3 | • attempts sentence forms but errors in grammar and punctuation predominate and distort the meaning |
| 2 | • cannot use sentence forms except in memorised phrases |
| 1 | • cannot use sentence forms at all |
| 0 | • does not attend • does not attempt the task in any way • writes a totally memorised response |
Lexical Resource (Vocabulary) 5/9
• may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader
| Score | General Report |
|---|---|
| 9 | • uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features; rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips |
| 8 | • uses a wide range of vocabulary • fluently and flexibly to convey precise meanings • skilfully uses uncommon lexical items but there may be occasional inaccuracies in word choice and collocation • produces rare errors in spelling and/or word formation |
| 7 | • uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision • uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation • may produce occasional errors in word choice, spelling and/or word formation |
| 6 | • uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task • attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy • makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication |
| 5 | • uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task • may make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader |
| 4 | • uses only basic vocabulary which may be used repetitively or which may be inappropriate for the task • has limited control of word formation and/or spelling; errors may cause strain for the reader |
| 3 | • uses only a very limited range of words and expressions with very limited control of word formation and/or spelling • errors may severely distort the message |
| 2 | • uses an extremely limited range of vocabulary; essentially no control of word formation and/or spelling |
| 1 | • can only use a few isolated words |
| 0 | • does not attend • does not attempt the task in any way • writes a totally memorised response |
Coherence & Cohesion 6/9
• uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical
• may not always use referencing clearly
or appropriately
uses paragraphing, but not always
logically
| Score | General Report |
|---|---|
| 9 | • uses cohesion in such a way that it attracts no attention • skilfully manages paragraphing |
| 8 | • sequences information and ideas logically • manages all aspects of cohesion well • uses paragraphing sufficiently and appropriately |
| 7 | • logically organises information and ideas; there is clear progression throughout • uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately although there may be some under-/over-use presents a clear central topic within each paragraph |
| 6 | • arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression • uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical • may not always use referencing clearly or appropriately uses paragraphing, but not always logically |
| 5 | • presents information with some organisation but there may be a lack of overall progression • makes inadequate, inaccurate or over use of cohesive devices • may be repetitive because of lack of referencing and substitution • may not write in paragraphs, or paragraphing may be inadequate |
| 4 | • presents information and ideas but these are not arranged coherently and there is no clear progression in the response • uses some basic cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive • may not write in paragraphs or their use may be confusing |
| 3 | • does not organise ideas logically • may use a very limited range of cohesive devices, and those used may not indicate a logical relationship between ideas |
| 2 | • has very little control of organisational features |
| 1 | • fails to communicate any message |
| 0 | • does not attend • does not attempt the task in any way • writes a totally memorised response |
సమీక్షను కోరడానికి ఖాతా సృష్టించండి.
You and your family are moving to another country for work, and you are looking to buy a house there.
Write a letter to a property agent. In your letter:
- Introduce yourself and your family
- Describe the type of accommodation that you hope to find
- Give your preference for the location of the accommodation
Write at least 150 words. You do NOT need to write any addresses.
Begin your letter as follows:
To Whom it May Concern,
ఈ ఫీచర్ మా premium సభ్యులకు మాత్రమే అందుబాటులో ఉంది.
అప్గ్రేడ్ చేసి గరిష్టంగా 50 AI వ్యాకరణ సవరణలకు ప్రవేశం పొందండి.
నమూనా వ్యాకరణ సవరణలు
The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.
Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.
Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for his assets to sell. According to the professor, being low on cash funds is not the same as being financially poor. However, in the reading, someone who borrows large amounts of money could not be wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passed.
Finally, the professor refutes the idea that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| doubts | The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| written | The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| reading, | A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| clarifies | The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| explains | The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| was | The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| his | The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| sell. According | The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| funds | The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| poor. | The correct adjective form is 'poor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| the reading, | The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| borrows | The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| The preposition 'of' is not needed here. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| wealthy, | The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| about | The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| regarding | The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| challenged | The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| passed. | The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| refutes | The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| that bribery | The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| points | The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| prison, | A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| existence | The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| పరిష్కారం | వివరణ |
|---|---|
| escape | The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping. |