The Writing Task 2 of the IELTS Academic/General test requires you to write an essay in response to a point of view, argument or problem. You will be presented with a topic and will be tested on your ability to respond by giving and justifying an opinion, discussing the topic, summarizing details, outlining problems, identifying possible solutions and supporting what you write with reasons, arguments and relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
- - Write in a formal style
- - Write at least 250 words
Write about the following topic:
It is often considered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remain the same. Do you think the advantages of change outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
出現在此練習題的單字
相關單字
沒有與此練習連結的單字
取得作文批改與文法糾錯,以及詳細分數報告。
assignment
取得高級寫作評論
寫作批改範例
分數總覽
AI 評審
評分標準回饋
優點
- 這篇文章回答了題目的兩個部分。
- 主要原因很清楚,而且一直與主題相關。
- 對社會的影響說明得很清楚,並且和原因連結在一起。
- 寫作者加入了一個符合主題的實際想法。
這篇文章清楚聚焦在為什麼出獄者會再次犯罪。在第一個主體段落中,原因是透過 “social prejudice” 和 “rejection that criminals naturally suffer” 這類片語來解釋的。這直接回答了關於原因的問題。
對社會的影響也用直接的方式說明。“the increase of violence rates” 這句顯示了重複犯罪對社會造成的明確結果。這讓文章緊扣題目,因為題目問的是對社會的影響,而不只是對罪犯本身的影響。
這篇文章也提出了一個有用的回應想法。關於 “public policies” 以及幫助公司雇用出獄者的句子,很好地支持了討論。這不是主要任務,但仍然符合主題,也顯示寫作者理解這個問題。
結尾的個人例子也支持了「重新融入社會是可行的」這個論點。它讓因果的討論更貼近現實,雖然發展得不是很充分。
待改進之處- 原因的解釋範圍很窄,只發展了一個主要原因。
- 有提到對社會的影響,但沒有充分探討。
- 有些部分偏離了因果的焦點。
- 結尾沒有完整總結主要想法。
文章大部分只圍繞一個主要原因:出獄後被排斥。這是相關的,但題目問的是 “causes”,所以如果再加上另一個清楚的原因,例如教育程度不足、出獄後支援不夠,或和以前的犯罪團體接觸,回答會更有力。可以簡單加上一句:“Another cause is the lack of training and support after release, so many people feel they have no legal way to start again.”
有提到社會影響,但只是簡短帶過。“Increase of violence rates” 是合理的影響,但文章可以再說明對社會的更多結果,例如社區居民的恐懼、警方的壓力,或更多的公共支出。例如:“This can make neighborhoods less safe and force the government to spend more money on prisons and policing.”
關於政府行動的段落很合理,但它稍微偏離了這篇文章的主要任務。題目主要問的是原因和影響。寫一兩句沒問題,但應該把更多篇幅用來發展題目要求的答案。
最後一段是個人故事,但它比較像額外的例子,而不是有力的結論。比較清楚的結尾可以重述答案的兩個部分。例如:“In short, rejection after prison can push people back into crime, and this harms society by increasing danger and social costs.”
改進練習- 寫作前,練習規劃兩個原因和兩個影響。
- 寫一個簡短的結論,重述你的主要原因和主要影響。
- 做一個只寫原因和影響句子的扣題練習。
寫作前,快速畫一個兩欄的表格:原因和影響。針對這個主題,每一欄各寫兩個想法。這能幫助你更完整地回答兩個部分。
練習寫兩句話的結論。第一句重述原因。第二句重述對社會的影響。保持簡短、直接。
用這個主題只寫六個句子:一句引言、兩句原因、兩句影響和一句結論。這能幫助你專注在題目確切要求的內容上。
文法多樣性與準確度
優點
- 這篇文章混合使用了簡單句和複雜句。
- 大部分句子清楚又容易理解。
- 寫作者能掌控連接性的文法,例如表示原因和結果的子句。
- 動詞形式常常用得正確。
文章中有較長的句型,不只是簡短的基本句。例如,“once released from prison, usually go back to crime, as they come through enormous obstacles” 用了時間片語和原因子句。這展現出一定的多樣性。
文章也很好地運用了表示因果的文法。“The rejection that criminals naturally suffer... causes them to seek opportunities” 這句對這種題型來說文法很有力,因為它清楚地連結了原因和結果。
關係子句和補充資訊也用得很好。在 “individuals who served a prison sentence” 中,“who served a prison sentence” 這個片語被正確地用來界定這個群體。這讓文章聽起來更精確。
動詞形式大致掌控得不錯。像 “he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional” 這樣的句子容易理解,而且大致準確。
待改進之處- 有些介系詞和詞形錯誤讓句子不夠自然。
- 冠詞、複數和句子形式方面有文法錯誤。
- 有幾個句子太長,變得比較難掌控。
- 最後一段有一些時態使用上的錯誤。
有好幾個文法問題來自固定片語和介系詞。例如,“reintegrated to society” 不如 “reintegrated into society” 準確。另外,“difficulty to be professionally reallocated” 改成 “difficulty finding work” 或 “difficulty being employed” 會更好。這些錯誤不會妨礙理解,但會降低準確度。
冠詞和形式方面也有小問題。“Does not have easy solution” 應該是 “does not have an easy solution.” “Government should create” 寫成 “The government should create” 聽起來會更完整。這些都是 IELTS 中常見的文法重點。
有些長句承載了太多想法。例如,以 “The immediate effect of this reality is that...” 開頭的句子可以理解,但變得很沉重,也比較難掌控。較短的句子能減少錯誤。比較清楚的版本可以是:“This situation pushes many ex-prisoners back into crime. As a result, violence in society may increase.”
在最後一段中,“he had also become a good citizen” 和其他動詞的時間順序不太搭配。比較好的版本是 “he also became a good citizen” 或 “he has also become a good citizen.” 這樣能讓時態的模式更清楚。
改進練習- 練習關鍵詞後面常見的介系詞搭配。
- 把長句改寫成兩個較短的句子。
- 做冠詞和動詞時態的修改練習。
為這個主題列出一份實用片語清單,例如 “reintegrate into society”、“return to crime” 和 “be released from prison”。每個片語都在新句子中寫三次。這能改善你在介系詞方面的文法。
從你的文章中挑兩個長句,把每一句都拆成兩個較短的句子。檢查意思是否仍然清楚。這能幫助你在考試情境下更好地掌控準確度。
做一個關於冠詞和時態的簡短修改練習。例如,把 “Government should create public policies” 改成 “The government should create public policies.” 然後把 “he had also become” 改成 “he also became.”
詞彙資源(詞彙)
優點
- 這篇文章使用了和犯罪及重新融入社會相關的主題詞彙。
- 用詞有一些變化。
- 寫作者嘗試使用較不常見的詞彙來解釋這個問題。
- 詞彙常常有助於清楚呈現因果關係。
文章用了許多很符合主題的詞,例如 “recidivism”、“offenders”、“released from prison” 和 “crime underworld”。這些詞和題目相關,讓回答聽起來很聚焦。
寫作者在指稱同一個群體時也有一些變化。文章用了 “criminals”、“offenders” 和 “individuals who served a prison sentence”。這避免了過多的重複,也展現出不錯的詞彙範圍。
文章也用了描述社會問題和感受的詞,例如 “social prejudice”、“rejected” 和 “raise awareness”。這些用詞有助於解釋為什麼出獄者可能會再次犯罪。
在好幾個地方,詞彙很好地支撐了因果的結構。例如,“causes them to seek opportunities” 和 “encouraging the return to crime” 清楚地顯示了想法之間的關係。
待改進之處- 有些用詞彆扭,或在英文中不自然。
- 有幾個詞意思用對了,但詞語搭配不夠好。
- 有拼字錯誤。
- 有些片語太正式或太沉重,降低了清晰度。
寫作者有時會選擇可以理解但不自然的詞。例如,“professionally reallocated” 不是談論找工作的一般說法。這裡用 “Find a job” 或 “return to the workforce” 會更合適。
也有一些詞語搭配不夠好。在這個句子中,“Come through enormous obstacles” 不是最好的搭配。比較自然的選擇是 “face enormous obstacles”。另外,“apply for job offers” 應該是 “apply for jobs”。這些修改能讓詞彙更準確。
有些拼字錯誤降低了用詞的品質。例子包括 “environenments”、“sytem” 和 “violance”。這些錯誤不會妨礙理解,但會降低整體用詞的掌控度。
有幾個片語太沉重,讓意思不夠直接。“Penitentiary system” 可以接受,但在這篇文章中,“prison system” 會更清楚、更自然。清楚準確的詞彙通常比非常正式的措辭效果更好。
改進練習- 建立一個附有自然詞語搭配的主題詞庫。
- 用你自己文章中的單字做拼字複習。
- 練習把沉重的片語換成更清楚的說法。
為這個主題做一張詞彙表。在一欄寫 “crime”、“prison” 和 “prejudice” 這類名詞。在下一欄加上自然的搭配,例如 “commit a crime”、“be sent to prison” 和 “face prejudice”。這能改善你的詞語搭配。
把你文章中拼錯的字抄下來,每個字正確地寫五次:“environments”、“system” 和 “violence”。然後把每個字用在一個新句子裡。
把你文章中正式的片語改寫成更簡單的英文。例如,把 “professionally reallocated” 改成 “find work”,把 “penitentiary system” 改成 “prison system”。這能讓你的詞彙更清楚、更自然。
連貫與銜接
優點
- 這篇文章的段落結構很清楚。
- 主要想法通常依照合理的順序排列。
- 有使用連接詞來表示補充、結果和對比。
- 大部分句子都和重複犯罪這個主題有清楚的連結。
文章分成幾個清楚的部分。第一段介紹這個議題。第二段解釋原因。第三段轉到影響和可能的行動。最後一段舉出一個例子。這讓文章整體很容易理解。
想法的推進方向也很合理。寫作者先從重新融入社會的問題開始,接著解釋被排斥和找工作的困難,然後說明對社會造成的結果。這個順序很適合因果型的文章。
連接詞在好幾個地方幫助了文章的流暢度。文章用了 “Furthermore”、“Besides”、“because of”、“consequently” 和 “On top of that”。這些詞顯示想法之間如何連結,並引導讀者理解整個討論。
指代詞也有助於銜接。例如,“this reality” 和 “such individuals” 指向前面提過的想法,所以寫作者不會太常重複同樣的名詞。
待改進之處- 有些分段的方式對這個題目來說效果不夠好。
- 有幾個連接詞用起來感覺很勉強,或有點不清楚。
- 最後一段不是有力的結論。
- 有些句子承載了太多想法,所以讀起來很沉重。
這篇文章有組織,但第三段把影響和解決方法混在一起。因為題目問的是原因和影響,比較清楚的做法是用一個主體段落寫原因,另一個主體段落只寫影響。這樣最後一段就可以寫簡短的結論。
文章有用連接詞,但不一定用得最好。例如,“Besides offering them means of survival, there are psychological effects” 作為連接有點彆扭。讀者必須停下來想清楚其中的關聯。比較簡單的連接方式是:“This group gives them money, and it also gives them a feeling of acceptance.”
最後一段感覺像額外的例子,而不是完整的結尾。讀完之後,文章就結束了,沒有清楚總結主要原因和主要影響。這削弱了整篇回答的結構。
有幾個句子塞了太多想法。例如,關於 “the general prejudice towards those who came from the penitentiary system” 的長句,同時包含了原因、結果和評論。把它拆開能讓文章更流暢。例如:“Society often judges former prisoners. This can push them back into crime and increase violence.”
改進練習- 寫作前,練習做一個簡單的四段式規劃。
- 把一個內容混雜的段落改寫成只有一個清楚目的的段落。
- 練習用兩句總結句寫簡短的結論。
寫作前,先記下四個段落各自的任務:引言、原因、影響、結論。然後每個部分只放相符的想法。這能讓你的文章結構更清楚。
拿出你的第三段,把影響和解決方法分開。寫一個只有影響的版本。這個練習能幫助你保持段落的焦點。
針對同一個主題寫三個簡短的結論。每個結論只寫兩句。第一句總結原因。第二句總結對社會的影響。
文法糾錯
The rejection that criminals naturally suffer when trying to be reinserted in society and to apply for job offers causes them to seek opportunities in the same environments where they felt at ease prior to their imprisonment, the crime underworld. Besides offering them means of survival, there are psychological effects in such environenments, given that their previous criminal partners tend to welcome them better than does society in general.
The immediate effect of this reality is that, because of the general prejudice towards those who came from the penitentiary sytem, society involuntarily ends up encouraging the return to crime and, consequently, the increase of violance rates. It is however a problem that does not have easy solution. Government should create public policies aiming at stimulating companies to hire such individuals and engage in campaigns to raise awareness among people not to reject them previously.
Personally, some years ago I knew a person who had served a four-year period in jail and, after his release, he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional. On top of that, he had also become a good citizen and started a family. Today, he is fully reintegrated to society.
The rejection that criminals naturally suffer when trying to be reinserted in society and to apply for job offers causes them to seek opportunities in the same environments where they felt at ease prior to their imprisonment, the crime underworld. Besides offering them means of survival, there are psychological effects in such environenments, environments, given that their previous criminal partners tend to welcome them better than does society in general.
The immediate effect of this reality is that, because of the general prejudice towards those who came from the penitentiary sytem, system, society involuntarily ends up encouraging the return to crime and, consequently, the increase of violance violence rates. It is however is, however, a problem that does not have an easy solution. Government should create public policies aiming at stimulating companies to hire such individuals and engage in campaigns to raise awareness among people not to reject them previously.
Personally, some years ago I knew a person who had served a four-year period in jail and, after his release, he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional. On top of that, he had also become a good citizen and started a family. Today, he is fully reintegrated to society.
改進建議
The rejection that former criminals naturally suffer often experience when trying to be reinserted in rejoin society and to apply for job offers causes jobs leads many of them to seek opportunities in the same environments where they felt at ease prior to their imprisonment, accepted before prison: the crime criminal underworld. Besides offering them a means of survival, there these environments also have a psychological impact, since their former criminal associates are psychological effects in such environments, given that their previous criminal partners tend to welcome them better usually more welcoming than does society in general. at large.
The immediate effect of this reality is that, because of the general widespread prejudice towards those against people who came from have been through the penitentiary prison system, society involuntarily ends up encouraging the unintentionally encourages their return to crime and, consequently, the increase of violence rates. It is, in violence. This is not, however, a problem that does not have an easy solution. Government can be easily solved. The government should create public policies aiming at stimulating to encourage companies to hire such these individuals and engage in launch campaigns to raise awareness among people not to reject them previously. and reduce prejudice against them.
Personally, some years ago I knew a person who had served a four-year period four years in jail prison and, after his release, he managed to return to the workforce and has become an excellent professional. On top of that, he had He also become became a good citizen and started a family. Today, he is fully reintegrated to into society.
cancel 文法修正
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| environments, | 拼字修正:這個字應該是 "environments",而不是 "environenments"。 |
cancel 文法修正
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| system, | "sytem" 這個字拼錯了。正確的拼法是 "system",這樣句子的文法才正確。 |
cancel 文法修正
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| violence | 這個字拼錯了。正確的拼法是 “violence”。 |
cancel 文法修正
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| is, however, | 在 “however” 後面需要加逗號,因為它是用來插入句中的連接副詞。 |
cancel 文法修正
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| an | 加上冠詞 “an”,因為後面接的是母音開頭的音,這樣片語的文法才正確。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| serious | 這裡用 "Serious" 比較自然,因為它用正式且恰當的方式描述這個問題。"Worrying" 可以理解,但 "serious" 更符合學術文章的文體。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| in the reintegration of former | 這個替換讓片語更精確、更正式。原本的措辭很彆扭,而新的說法清楚指出前罪犯回歸社會的過程。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| into | 提到移動或回到某個群體或地方時,正確的介系詞是 "into"。"Reintegrated into society" 是自然的說法。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| 刪除這個片語,讓句子更直接,文法上也更順暢。前後的字詞已經表達了這個意思,所以它是多餘的。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| A | 這個修改刪除了不必要的開頭片語,讓句子更簡潔。直接以 "A" 開頭更自然,也比較不重複。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| return | 這裡用 "Return" 是更簡單、更正式的動詞選擇。它避免了重複,在學術語境中聽起來也更合適。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| crime because | 在這個句子中,"Because" 比 "as" 更能清楚表達因果關係。它讓他們行為背後的原因更容易理解。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| face major | 在這個語境中,"Face major" 是正確且更自然的說法。原本的片語在英文中不是道地的用法。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| being | 這個修改修正了句子的文法結構。"Being" 比 "be normally" 更符合這個句型。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| In addition, people | "In addition, people" 聽起來比 "Furthermore, individuals" 更自然,也沒那麼正式。它也在保留原意的同時提升了可讀性。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| have | 需要動詞 "have",句子的文法才完整。少了它,句子就缺少適當的動詞片語。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| 在這個說法中不需要這個冠詞,它讓片語變得不自然。刪掉它能改善文法和流暢度。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| sentences often | 把單數名詞換成複數結構,更符合正在討論的想法。"Sentences often" 也讓句子讀起來更自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| great | 這裡用 "Great" 這個形容詞比較合適,因為它表達的意思更強烈、更自然。原本的片語很彆扭,也不夠道地。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| finding employment | "Finding employment" 是描述找到工作正確且自然的片語。"Professionally reallocated" 在英文中不自然,也不太符合這個語境。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| former | 需要用 "Former" 來明確指出句子說的是以前曾經犯罪的人,讓片語更精確、更自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| often experience | 這裡用 "Often experience" 聽起來比較合適,因為它描述的是常見的結果,而不會暗示被排斥是罪犯本身固有或天生的特質。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| rejoin | "Rejoin" 是英文中表示回歸社會更簡短、更自然的動詞,而 "be reinserted in" 既彆扭又不自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| 在這個結構中不需要這個字,所以刪掉它能讓文法更順暢。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| jobs leads many of | 這個修正讓因果關係更清楚、更符合文法,改善了句子結構。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| accepted before prison: | 這個修改把彆扭的說法換成更自然的片語,讓想法更清楚、更直接。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| criminal | 這裡 "Criminal" 才是正確的形容詞,因為它能正確地修飾 "underworld"。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| a | 在 "criminal underworld" 前面需要冠詞 "a",這個名詞片語的文法才完整。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| these environments also have a psychological impact, since their former criminal associates | 這個替換直接說明這些環境在心理上影響他們,並解釋他們為什麼會被吸引回去,讓意思更清楚。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| usually more welcoming | 這個片語改用更符合語境的比較說法,變得更簡單、更自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| 這個字沒有必要,而且破壞了句子的文法結構,所以應該刪掉。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| at large. | 這裡 "At large" 是指整個社會的正確說法。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| widespread | "Widespread" 是描述影響許多人的偏見更有力、更準確的形容詞。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| against people | 在這個語境中,"Against people" 更自然,也更能表達針對出獄者的偏見。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| have been through | "Have been through" 是提到像服刑這類經歷更自然的說法。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| prison | 在這個語境中,“Prison” 是英文中更自然、更常見的字,而 “penitentiary” 在這裡聽起來比較正式,也比較不自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| unintentionally encourages their | 這個修改使用更直接、更自然的說法。“Unintentionally encourages” 比 “involuntarily ends up encouraging the” 更清楚、更簡潔。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| in violence. This is not, | “Increase of violence rates” 在英文中很彆扭,所以 “in violence” 聽起來更自然。加入的對比也讓句子更流暢。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| can be easily solved. The government | 這個修改使用正確的主詞和更清楚的被動結構,讓句子更符合文法、更自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| to encourage | 在這個語境中,“To encourage” 比 “aiming at stimulating” 更簡單、更道地。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| these | 用 “These” 比較合適,因為它直接指正在討論的這些人,而 “such” 在這裡比較不精確。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| launch | “Launch” 是表示發起活動更好的動詞,而 “engage in” 太籠統,也比較不自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| and reduce prejudice against them. | 這個修改把重點放在減少偏見,取代了 “not to reject them previously” 這個彆扭的片語,讓想法表達得更清楚、更自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| four years | “Four years” 比 “a four-year period” 更簡潔、更自然。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| prison | 在這個語境中,特別是提到服刑時,“Prison” 是更標準的用詞。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| 這裡不需要這個字,刪掉它能避免重複,讓句子更流暢。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| 這個片語中不需要這個字,刪掉它能修正時態,讓句子更順暢。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| He | 這個片語經過簡化,讓句子更直接,並避免彆扭的轉折。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| became | 需要用過去式 “became”,因為這個句子描述的是過去已經完成的動作。 |
cancel 改進建議
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| into | “reintegrated” 要搭配的正確介系詞是 “Into”,這樣片語的文法才正確。 |
評分標準報告
任務回應 6/9
• 提出相關的立場,但結論可能變得不清楚或重複
• 提出相關的主要想法,但有些可能發展不足或不清楚
| 分數 | 總體報告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 完整回應題目的所有部分 • 針對題目提出充分發展的立場,並以相關、充分延伸且有力支持的想法來說明 |
| 8 | • 充分回應題目的所有部分 • 針對題目提出發展完善的回應,並有相關、有延伸且有支持的想法 |
| 7 | • 回應題目的所有部分 • 整篇回答都呈現清楚的立場 • 提出、延伸並支持主要想法,但可能有過度概括的傾向,和/或支持的想法可能缺乏焦點 |
| 6 | • 回應題目的所有部分,但有些部分可能比其他部分涵蓋得更完整 • 提出相關的立場,但結論可能變得不清楚或重複 • 提出相關的主要想法,但有些可能發展不足或不清楚 |
| 5 | • 只部分回應題目;格式有些地方可能不恰當 • 有表達立場,但發展不一定清楚,也可能沒有得出結論 • 提出一些主要想法,但這些想法有限,且發展不夠充分;可能有不相關的細節 |
| 4 | • 只以最低限度回應題目,或回答偏離主題;格式可能不恰當 • 有提出立場,但不清楚 • 提出一些主要想法,但很難辨識,而且可能重複、不相關或缺乏充分支持 |
| 3 | • 沒有適當回應題目的任何部分 • 沒有表達清楚的立場 • 提出的想法很少,而且大多沒有發展或 與題目不相關 |
| 2 | • 幾乎沒有回應題目 • 沒有表達立場 • 可能嘗試提出一兩個想法,但完全沒有發展 |
| 1 | • 回答與題目完全無關 |
| 0 | • 未出席考試 • 完全沒有嘗試作答 • 寫出完全背誦的回答 |
文法多樣性與準確度 6/9
• 文法和標點符號有一些錯誤,但很少
影響溝通
| 分數 | 總體報告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 使用多樣的句型結構,運用完全靈活且準確;極少出現的小錯誤只是「一時筆誤」 |
| 8 | • 使用多樣的句型結構 • 大部分句子沒有錯誤 • 只有非常偶爾出現錯誤或不恰當之處 |
| 7 | • 使用多種複雜句型 • 經常寫出沒有錯誤的句子 • 文法和標點符號掌握良好,但可能有少數錯誤 |
| 6 | • 混合使用簡單句和複雜句 • 文法和標點符號有一些錯誤,但很少 影響溝通 |
| 5 | • 只使用有限的句型結構 • 會嘗試寫複雜句,但往往不如簡單句準確 • 可能經常出現文法錯誤,標點符號也可能有誤;這些錯誤可能讓讀者閱讀時有些困難 |
| 4 | • 只使用非常有限的句型結構,很少使用從屬子句 • 有些句型結構正確,但以錯誤居多,標點符號也常常有誤 |
| 3 | • 嘗試使用一些句型,但文法和標點符號錯誤居多,並扭曲了意思 |
| 2 | • 除了背誦的片語之外,無法使用任何句型 |
| 1 | • 完全無法使用句型 |
| 0 | • 未出席考試 • 完全沒有嘗試作答 • 寫出完全背誦的回答 |
詞彙資源(詞彙) 6/9
• 嘗試使用較不常見的詞彙,但有些不準確
• 拼字和/或構詞有一些錯誤,但這些錯誤
不妨礙溝通
| 分數 | 總體報告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 使用豐富多樣的詞彙,對詞彙特性的掌控非常自然且純熟;極少出現的小錯誤只是「一時筆誤」 |
| 8 | • 使用豐富多樣的詞彙 • 流暢且靈活地表達精確的意思 • 熟練地使用不常見的詞彙,但在用詞和詞語搭配上偶爾可能不準確 • 極少出現拼字 和/或構詞錯誤 |
| 7 | • 使用足夠多樣的詞彙,能展現一定的靈活度和精確度 • 使用較不常見的詞彙,並對語體風格和詞語搭配有一定的認識 • 偶爾可能出現用詞、拼字和/或構詞錯誤 |
| 6 | • 使用足以完成題目的詞彙範圍 • 嘗試使用較不常見的詞彙,但有些不準確 • 拼字和/或構詞有一些錯誤,但這些錯誤 不妨礙溝通 |
| 5 | • 使用的詞彙範圍有限,但勉強足以完成題目 • 拼字和/或構詞可能出現明顯錯誤,可能讓讀者閱讀時有些困難 |
| 4 | • 只使用基本詞彙,可能重複使用,或可能不適合題目 • 對構詞和/或拼字的掌控有限;錯誤可能讓讀者閱讀吃力 |
| 3 | • 只使用非常有限的詞語和表達方式,對構詞和/或拼字的掌控非常有限 • 錯誤可能嚴重扭曲 要傳達的訊息 |
| 2 | • 使用的詞彙範圍極為有限;基本上無法掌控構詞和/或拼字 |
| 1 | • 只能使用少數零散的單字 |
| 0 | • 未出席考試 • 完全沒有嘗試作答 • 寫出完全背誦的回答 |
連貫與銜接 6/9
• 有效使用銜接手法,但句子內和/或句子之間的銜接可能有誤或顯得生硬
• 指代用法可能不一定清楚
或恰當
有分段,但分段不一定
合乎邏輯
| 分數 | 總體報告 |
|---|---|
| 9 | • 銜接運用得非常自然,完全不會引人注意 • 熟練地處理分段 |
| 8 | • 有邏輯地安排資訊和想法的順序 • 妥善處理銜接的各個面向 • 分段充分且恰當 |
| 7 | • 有邏輯地組織資訊和想法;全文有清楚的推進 • 適當使用多種銜接手法,但可能有 一些使用不足或過度使用的情況;每個段落內 都有清楚的中心主題 |
| 6 | • 連貫地安排資訊和想法,整體有清楚的推進 • 有效使用銜接手法,但句子內和/或句子之間的銜接可能有誤或顯得生硬 • 指代用法可能不一定清楚 或恰當 有分段,但分段不一定 合乎邏輯 |
| 5 | • 呈現資訊時有一定的組織,但可能缺乏 整體的推進 • 銜接手法使用不足、不準確或過度使用 • 因為缺少指代和替換,可能顯得重複 • 可能沒有分段,或分段不足 |
| 4 | • 有呈現資訊和想法,但安排得不連貫, 回答中也沒有清楚的推進 • 使用一些基本的銜接手法,但可能不準確或重複 • 可能沒有分段,或 分段方式可能令人困惑 |
| 3 | • 沒有有邏輯地組織想法 • 可能只使用非常有限的銜接手法,而且使用的手法可能 無法顯示想法之間的邏輯關係 |
| 2 | • 幾乎無法掌控 組織結構 |
| 1 | • 無法傳達任何訊息 |
| 0 | • 未出席考試 • 完全沒有嘗試作答 • 寫出完全背誦的回答 |
請建立帳號以申請批改。
Write about the following topic:
It is often considered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remain the same. Do you think the advantages of change outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
範例語法批改
The professor explain that the Chevalier rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its assets to selling. Accordingly, to the professor, being low on cash fund is not same as being financially poors. However, in reading someone who borrowing large of amounts of money could not be wealth, therefore the Chevalier must have lied his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging by the professor as well. She explains that, due to habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing.
Finally, the professor refute the idea briber was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explain explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in the cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for its his assets to selling. Accordingly, sell. According to the professor, being low on cash fund funds is not the same as being financially poors. poor. However, in reading the reading, someone who borrowing borrows large of amounts of money could not be wealth, wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regards regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenging challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passing. passed.
Finally, the professor refute refutes the idea briber that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She point points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existences existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escaping escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
The professor explains that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but poor in cash, while he lived in Switzerland and had to occasionally borrow funds while waiting for his assets to sell. According to the professor, being low on cash funds is not the same as being financially poor. However, in the reading, someone who borrows large amounts of money could not be wealthy, therefore the Chevalier must have lied about his wealthy life in Switzerland.
The skepticism regarding the reliability of the recorded conversations with Voltaire is challenged by the professor as well. She explains that, due to the habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire immediately afterward, the Chevalier was able to recall those discussions in detail even after several years had passed.
Finally, the professor refutes the idea that bribery was how the Chevalier got out of prison. She points out that because even the other prisoners who had better resources were unable to successfully bribe their way out of prison, it was very unlikely that bribery was how he escaped. Also, she notes the existence of government papers recording repair work done to the Chevalier's prison cell ceiling as strong evidence that his escape from the prison was accurately recorded.
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| doubts | The plural form 'doubts' is needed here because there are multiple uncertainties being discussed. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| written | The correct past participle of 'write' is 'written'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| reading, | A comma is needed after 'reading' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| clarifies | The third person singular form 'clarifies' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| explains | The third person singular form 'explains' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| was | The verb 'was' is needed to form the past continuous tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| The article 'the' is not needed before 'assets'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| his | The possessive pronoun 'his' is needed to refer back to 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| sell. According | The verb 'sell' is needed here, and 'According' should start a new sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| funds | The plural form 'funds' is needed here because it refers to money in general. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| poor. | The correct adjective form is 'poor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| the reading, | The article 'the' is needed before 'reading', and a comma is needed to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| borrows | The present simple tense 'borrows' is needed to describe a general situation. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| The preposition 'of' is not needed here. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| wealthy, | The adjective 'wealthy' is needed to describe 'the Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| about | The preposition 'about' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| regarding | The preposition 'regarding' is needed to introduce the topic of the sentence. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| challenged | The past participle 'challenged' is needed to form the passive voice. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| the | The article 'the' is needed before 'Chevalier'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| passed. | The past participle 'passed' is needed to form the past perfect tense. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| refutes | The third person singular form 'refutes' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'professor'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| that bribery | The noun 'bribery' is needed to refer to the act of giving bribes. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| points | The third person singular form 'points' is needed to agree with the singular subject 'she'. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| prison, | A comma is needed after 'prison' to separate the two independent clauses. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| existence | The singular form 'existence' is needed because it refers to one specific thing. |
cancel Grammar Correction
| 解答 | 說明 |
|---|---|
| escape | The noun 'escape' is needed to refer to the act of escaping. |